August 2014 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 579925] Review Request: tcl-tclreadline - GNU Readline extension for Tcl/Tk

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925 R P Herrold <herrold(a)owlriver.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from R P Herrold <herrold(a)owlriver.com> --- looks good [herrold@centos-6 tclreadline]$ rpmlint /home/herrold/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-3.orc6.src.rpm /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-3.orc6.x86_64.rpm tcl-tclreadline.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tk -> kt, t, k tcl-tclreadline.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tk -> kt, t, k 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [herrold@centos-6 tclreadline]$ PASS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 579925] Review Request: tcl-tclreadline - GNU Readline extension for Tcl/Tk

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925 --- Comment #15 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de> --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/tcl-tclreadline.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-3.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 579925] Review Request: tcl-tclreadline - GNU Readline extension for Tcl/Tk

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925 --- Comment #14 from Robert Lightfoot <BobLfoot(a)gmail.com> --- I was running the current version of rpmlint for centos6. That system no longer exists having been migrated to Centos7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 579925] Review Request: tcl-tclreadline - GNU Readline extension for Tcl/Tk

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925 --- Comment #13 from R P Herrold <herrold(a)owlriver.com> --- Created attachment 923994 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=923994&action=edit patch at proposed rel 3 to address remainint rpmlint issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 579925] Review Request: tcl-tclreadline - GNU Readline extension for Tcl/Tk

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925 --- Comment #12 from R P Herrold <herrold(a)owlriver.com> --- Hi, Robert Lightfoot I get a different set of objections from my rpmlint evaluation ... obviously some of the 'spelling error' stuff are inapplicable [herrold@centos-6 tclreadline]$ rpmlint /home/herrold/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-2.orc6.src.rpm /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-2.orc6.x86_64.rpm /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/tcl-tclreadline-devel-2.1.0-2.orc6.x86_64.rpm tcl-tclreadline.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tk -> kt, t, k tcl-tclreadline.src:57: W: macro-in-comment %doc tcl-tclreadline.src:72: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} ... addressed in a patch I shall apply in a moment tcl-tclreadline.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tk -> kt, t, k tcl-tclreadline-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation .... placeholder 'documentation' in a sub-package makes no sense, as it is tied to its parent package when properly installed: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -- PASS 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. [herrold@centos-6 tclreadline]$ rpmlint -V rpmlint version 1.5 Copyright (C) 1999-2007 Frederic Lepied, Mandriva [herrold@centos-6 tclreadline]$ I am not seeing locate issues in my run ... what version of rpmlint are you running? Robert Scheck Could you please apply the patch if you find it acceptable, and note a URL where the revised package set might be pulled from, and we can move this along directly With the patched spec file locally I now get: [herrold@centos-6 tclreadline]$ rpmlint /home/herrold/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-3.orc6.src.rpm /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/tcl-tclreadline-2.1.0-3.orc6.x86_64.rpm tcl-tclreadline.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tk -> kt, t, k tcl-tclreadline.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tk -> kt, t, k 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1113712] New: Review Request: lua-bitop - C extension module for Lua 5.1/5.2 which adds bitwise operations on numbers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113712 Bug ID: 1113712 Summary: Review Request: lua-bitop - C extension module for Lua 5.1/5.2 which adds bitwise operations on numbers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: orion(a)cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-bitop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lua-bitop-1.0.2-1.el7.src.rpm Description: C extension module for Lua 5.1/5.2 which adds bitwise operations on numbers. Fedora Account System Username: orion This package is to provide a needed dependency for lua-posix for EPEL7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

9 years, 9 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 990278] New: Review Request: krfb - Desktop Sharing

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990278 Bug ID: 990278 Summary: Review Request: krfb - Desktop Sharing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdieter(a)math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdenetwork/krfb.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdenetwork/krfb-4.10.97-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Desktop Sharing Fedora Account System Username: rdieter Formerly part of kdenetwork monolithic package, upstream has split this out into it's own tarball for kde-4.11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ftnK2Mdg8q&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 9 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmavrogi(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review August 2014