[Bug 965431] New: Review Request: gedit-editorconfig - EditorConfig plugin for Gedit
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965431
Bug ID: 965431
Summary: Review Request: gedit-editorconfig - EditorConfig
plugin for Gedit
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: Package Review
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: llaumgui(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
EditorConfig helps developers define and maintain consistent coding styles
between different editors and IDEs. The EditorConfig project consists of a file
format for defining coding styles and a collection of text editor plugins that
enable editors to read the file format and adhere to defined styles.
EditorConfig files are easily readable and they work nicely with version
control systems.
---
SPEC:
https://projects.llaumgui.com/p/rpmbuild/source/tree/master/SPECS/gedit-e...
SRPM:
http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/gedit-editorconfig/gedit-editorco...
rpmlint:
gedit-editorconfig.x86_64: E: no-binary
gedit-editorconfig.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
gedit-editorconfig.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/editorconfig_plugin/gedit2.py
gedit-editorconfig.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/editorconfig_plugin/__init__.py
gedit-editorconfig.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/editorconfig.plugin
gedit-editorconfig.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/editorconfig_plugin/shared.py
gedit-editorconfig.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/editorconfig_plugin/gedit3.py
gedit-editorconfig.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/editorconfig_gedit3.py
gedit-editorconfig-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 1 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u7Jtb0vQW4&a=cc_unsubscribe
6 years, 2 months
[Bug 1023690] New: Review Request: rspamd - Fast, free and open-source spam filtering system
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023690
Bug ID: 1023690
Summary: Review Request: rspamd - Fast, free and open-source
spam filtering system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: cickumqt(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/rspamd.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/rspamd-0.5.6-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description: Rspamd filtering system is created as a replacement of popular
'''spamassassin''' spamd and is designed to be fast, modular and easily
extendable system. Rspamd core is written in C language using event driven
paradigma. Plugins for rspamd can be written in lua. Rspamd is designed to
process connections completely asynchronous and do not block anywhere in code.
Fedora Account System Username:cicku
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1130199] New: Review Request: kyua - Testing framework for infrastructure software
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130199
Bug ID: 1130199
Summary: Review Request: kyua - Testing framework for
infrastructure software
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: jmmv+fedora(a)meroh.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://portal.meroh.net/~jmmv/kyua.spec
SRPM URL: http://portal.meroh.net/~jmmv/kyua-0.10-1.fc20.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: jmmv
----- IMPORTANT -----
This new package is actually a replacement for the old kyua-cli and
kyua-testers packages. Upstream has merged both components into a single
distfile and the packages should follow suit. The spec file being submitted
here is mostly a copy/paste of the kyua-cli.spec file with the corresponding
adjustments.
I'd appreciate a clarification on the process to execute the correct
replacement of the previous packages with this new one.
----- IMPORTANT -----
Description:
Kyua is a testing framework for infrastructure software, originally
designed to equip BSD-based operating systems with a test suite. This
means that Kyua is lightweight and simple, and that Kyua integrates well
with various build systems and continuous integration frameworks.
Kyua features an expressive test suite definition language, a safe
runtime engine for test suites and a powerful report generation engine.
Kyua is for both developers and users, from the developer applying a
simple fix to a library to the system administrator deploying a new
release on a production machine.
Kyua is able to execute test programs written with a plethora of testing
libraries and languages. The library of choice is ATF, for which Kyua
was originally designed, but simple, framework-less test programs and
TAP-compliant test programs can also be executed through Kyua.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 972346] New: Review Request: ros-common_msgs - Common ROS Messages
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972346
Bug ID: 972346
Summary: Review Request: ros-common_msgs - Common ROS Messages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: richmattes(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/rospackages/common-msgs/ros-common_msgs.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/rospackages/common-msgs/ros-common_msgs-1...
Description:
common_msgs contains messages that are widely used by other ROS packages.
These includes messages for actions (actionlib_msgs), diagnostics
(diagnostic_msgs), geometric primitives (geometry_msgs), robot navigation
(nav_msgs), and common sensors (sensor_msgs), such as laser range finders,
cameras, point clouds.
Fedora Account System Username: rmattes
rpmlint mostly complains about spelling and documentation:
$ rpmlint ros-common_msgs.spec ../../RPMS/noarch/*_msgs-1.8.13-1*
ros-actionlib_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) actionlib -> action
lib, action-lib, libation
ros-actionlib_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US actionlib ->
action lib, action-lib, libation
ros-actionlib_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US msgs ->
mags, megs, mugs
ros-actionlib_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
ros-common_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US msgs -> mags,
megs, mugs
ros-common_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US actionlib ->
action lib, action-lib, libation
ros-common_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nav -> van,
nab, av
ros-common_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
ros-diagnostic_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime ->
run time, run-time, rudiment
ros-diagnostic_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
ros-geometry_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US msgs -> mags,
megs, mugs
ros-geometry_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
interoperability -> interchangeability, invulnerability, inseparability
ros-geometry_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
ros-nav_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) nav -> van, nab, av
ros-nav_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nav -> van, nab,
av
ros-nav_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US msgs -> mags,
megs, mugs
ros-nav_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
ros-sensor_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
ros-shape_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
ros-stereo_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US msgs -> mags,
megs, mugs
ros-stereo_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
ros-trajectory_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
ros-visualization_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US msgs ->
mags, megs, mugs
ros-visualization_msgs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rviz ->
viz, r viz
ros-visualization_msgs.noarch: W: no-documentation
10 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 25 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=F4RIOiIdPR&a=cc_unsubscribe
6 years, 3 months