April 2019 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1441843] Review Request: linchpin - Ansible based multicloud orchestrator

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843 --- Comment #35 from Jonathan Dieter <jdieter(a)gmail.com> --- Greg, last I checked, we were almost finished with this. Are you still interested in moving forward with this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1694278] New: Review Request: python-fastpurge - A Python client for the Akamai Fast Purge API

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694278 Bug ID: 1694278 Summary: Review Request: python-fastpurge - A Python client for the Akamai Fast Purge API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: rohan(a)mcgovern.id.au QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~rohanpm/python-fastpurge/1/python-fastpurge.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~rohanpm/python-fastpurge/1/python-fastpurge-1.0... Description: This library provides a simple asynchronous Python wrapper for the Fast Purge API, including authentication and error recovery. Fedora Account System Username: rohanpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 1558312] Review Request: etherwallet - Client-side tool for interacting with the Ethereum network

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558312 --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- Repost as is and I'll review the thingie. Don't forget to add a Provides: bundled(jquery) = 1.12.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1558312] Review Request: etherwallet - Client-side tool for interacting with the Ethereum network

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558312 --- Comment #5 from Rene Jr Purcell <rene.purcell(a)gmail.com> --- Hi Robert, I should have updated those request. I've talked with few helping folks on freenode after I posted those review request and they told me exactly the same thing as your last comment. I then realised there a load of dependency in there.. And I just can't build packages for all of those, if I remember it was like 200 nodejs dependency.. So I don't know if things has changed since but if I really need to build packages for every dependency than I will not have the time required to do this unfortunately.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1009446] Review Request: open-mtools - Tools for testing IP multicast

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009446 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov(a)gmail.com Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2019-04-05 11:32:32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 917162] Review Request: salt-cloud - Generic cloud provisioning tool

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917162 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov(a)gmail.com Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2019-04-05 11:32:05 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> --- Salt-cloud is the part of the salt package. This one should be retired. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 555843] Review Request: pam_radius - PAM Module for RADIUS Authentication

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555843 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov(a)gmail.com Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed|2010-02-23 16:06:52 |2019-04-05 11:25:23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1120552] Review Request: ghc-websockets - A sensible and clean way to write WebSocket-capable servers in Haskell

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120552 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- - Bump to 0.12.5.3 Package approved. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License". 33 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-websockets/review-ghc- websockets/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ghc- websockets [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1290240 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-websockets-0.12.5.2-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm ghc-websockets-devel-0.12.5.2-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm ghc-websockets-0.12.5.2-1.fc31.src.rpm ghc-websockets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP ghc-websockets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, GitHub ghc-websockets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jaspervdj -> jasper ghc-websockets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lhs -> ls, ohs, lbs ghc-websockets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs ghc-websockets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US www -> WWW, wow ghc-websockets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whatwg -> what ghc-websockets.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libHSwebsockets-0.12.5.2-6Rvr4cIU6BTEJkbLdM5yYi-ghc8.4.4.so ghc-websockets.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-websockets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP ghc-websockets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, GitHub ghc-websockets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jaspervdj -> jasper ghc-websockets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lhs -> ls, ohs, lbs ghc-websockets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs ghc-websockets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US www -> WWW, wow ghc-websockets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whatwg -> what 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1693030] New: Review Request: python-hdmf - The Hierarchical Data Modeling Framework

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693030 Bug ID: 1693030 Summary: Review Request: python-hdmf - The Hierarchical Data Modeling Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora SPEC: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-hdmf.spec SRPM: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-hdmf-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: The Hierarchical Data Modeling Framework FAS: lbazan koji build --scratch rawhide python-hdmf-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Uploading srpm: python-hdmf-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:31 14.01 MiB 449.17 KiB/sec Created task: 33784871 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33784871 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 33784871 build (rawhide, python-hdmf-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm): open (buildvm-aarch64-09.arm.fedoraproject.org) 33784872 buildArch (python-hdmf-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-25.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 33784872 buildArch (python-hdmf-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-25.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 33784871 build (rawhide, python-hdmf-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm): open (buildvm-aarch64-09.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 33784871 build (rawhide, python-hdmf-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm) completed successfully -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 1689397] New: Review Request: trellis - Lattice ECP5 FPGA bitstream creation/analysis/programming tools

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689397 Bug ID: 1689397 Summary: Review Request: trellis - Lattice ECP5 FPGA bitstream creation/analysis/programming tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: somlo(a)cmu.edu QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/trellis-rpm/trellis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/trellis-rpm/trellis-1.0-0.1.2019... Description: Project Trellis enables a fully open-source flow for ECP5 FPGAs using Yosys for Verilog synthesis and nextpnr for place and route. Project Trellis provides the device database and tools for bitstream creation. Fedora Account System Username: somlo NOTE 1: rpmlint will complain about "nextpnr" being a spelling error -- it's not, nextpnr is an FPGA place-and-route tool that uses trellis as a dependency. NOTE 2: rpmlint will also issue "binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath" warnings on several binaries shipping with the package. This is intentional, as they all use a private, package-specific shared library installed as a subdirectory of %{_libdir} (i.e., %{_libdir}%{name}/). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years

1
21
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review April 2019