[Bug 1707795] New: Review Request: nutty- Simple utility for network
information
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707795
Bug ID: 1707795
Summary: Review Request: nutty- Simple utility for network
information
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/nutty.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/nutty-1.1.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description:
A simple application made for elementary OS to provide essential information on
network related aspects. The information presented in as the following tabs.
• My Info: Provides basic and detailed information for the device network card
• Usage: Provides network data usage in two views - historical usage and
current usage
• Speed: Check Upload and Download speeds and get route times to a host
• Ports: Provides information on active ports and application using them on the
local device
• Devices: Monitors, alerts and provides information on the other devices
connected on the network
Fedora Account System Username: atim
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5 years
[Bug 1705264] New: Review Request: python-mitogen - Distributed
self-replicating programs in Python
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705264
Bug ID: 1705264
Summary: Review Request: python-mitogen - Distributed
self-replicating programs in Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: carl(a)george.computer
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/carlwgeorge/python-mitoge...
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/carlwgeorge/python-mitoge...
Description:
Mitogen is a Python library for writing distributed self-replicating programs.
There is no requirement for installing packages, copying files around, writing
shell snippets, upfront configuration, or providing any secondary link to a
remote machine aside from an SSH connection. Due to its origins for use in
managing potentially damaged infrastructure, the remote machine need not even
have free disk space or a writeable filesystem.
It is not intended as a generic RPC framework; the goal is to provide a robust
and efficient low-level API on which tools like Salt, Ansible, or Fabric can be
built, and while the API is quite friendly and comparable to Fabric, ultimately
it is not intended for direct use by consumer software.
The focus is to centralize and perfect the intricate dance required to run
Python code safely and efficiently on a remote machine, while avoiding
temporary files or large chunks of error-prone shell scripts, and supporting
common privilege escalation techniques like sudo, potentially in combination
with exotic connection methods such as WMI, telnet, or console-over-IPMI.
Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5 years
[Bug 1652036] Review Request: cockpit-session-recording - Package
provides session recording playback in Cockpit
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652036
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |POST
Assignee|kgliebov(a)redhat.com |zebob.m(a)gmail.com
Flags|needinfo?(zebob.m(a)gmail.com |fedora-review+
|) |
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
- Make %setup quiet with -q
%setup -qn cockpit-session-recording
Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issue before import.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: cockpit-session-recording-1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
cockpit-session-recording-1-1.fc31.src.rpm
cockpit-session-recording.noarch: W: no-documentation
cockpit-session-recording.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tlog ->
tog, log, slog
cockpit-session-recording.src:20: W: setup-not-quiet
cockpit-session-recording.src: W: no-%build-section
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5 years