June 2019 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1660538] New: Review Request: emacs-popup - Visual popup user interface library for Emacs

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1660538 Bug ID: 1660538 Summary: Review Request: emacs-popup - Visual popup user interface library for Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tim(a)tim-landscheidt.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora popup is a visual popup user interface library for Emacs. This provides a basic API and common UI widgets such as popup tool-tips and popup menus. Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/scfc/emacs-auto-complete-... SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/scfc/emacs-auto-complete-... Description: Visual popup user interface library for Emacs Fedora Account System Username: scfc This is my first package and I need a sponsor. Example build at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/scfc/emacs-auto-complete-update/b.... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1416705] Review Request: python3-kivy - Kivy - Multimedia / Multitouch framework in Python

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705 --- Comment #27 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)online.de> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #25) > - You didn't fix it as I recommended, you need to remove the shebang, not > add executable bitsor change the shebang: > > # E: wrong-script-interpreter > sed -i -e 's|#!/usr/bin/env python|#!/usr/bin/python3|g' > kivy/tools/kviewer.py > sed -i -e 's|#!/usr/bin/env python|#!/usr/bin/python3|g' > kivy/tools/pep8checker/pep8.py > sed -i -e 's|#!/usr/bin/env python|#!/usr/bin/python3|g' > kivy/tools/pep8checker/pre-commit.githook > > # E: non-executable-script > chmod a+x kivy/tools/kviewer.py > chmod a+x kivy/tools/pep8checker/pep8.py > chmod a+x kivy/tools/pep8checker/pre-commit.githook > > > for lib in $(find -type f -name '*.py'); do > sed '1{\@^#!@d}' $lib > $lib.new && > touch -r $lib $lib.new && > mv $lib.new $lib > done > > We don't care about pre-commit.githook > > - I can't build the package: > > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: No matching package to install: > 'google-roboto-mono-fonts' > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Not all dependencies satisfied > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error: Some packages could not be found. > > This package does not exist. > > Actually it existed but it's now orphaned: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-roboto-mono-fonts I know this, i have compiled the package locally on my computer. the packages could't be installed due dependencies [martin@f30 SPECS]$ sudo rpm -Uvh /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/python3-kivy-1.11.0-3.fc30.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/python3-kivy-devel-1.11.0-3.fc30.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/python3-kivy-examples-1.11.0-3.fc30.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python3-kivy-doc-1.11.0-3.fc30.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: python3.7dist(kivy-garden) >= 0.1.4 is needed by python3-kivy-1.11.0-3.fc30.x86_64 I created a new spec file, rpmlint no longer reports a shebang issue. SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/python-kivy.spec Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/python-kivy-1.11.0-3.fc30.... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1713232] New: Review Request: openhantek - Hantek USB digital signal oscilloscope

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713232 Bug ID: 1713232 Summary: Review Request: openhantek - Hantek USB digital signal oscilloscope Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: vascom2(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/openhantek.git/plain/openhantek.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/5599/325599/openhantek-2.0... Description: OpenHantek is a free software for Hantek and compatible (Voltcraft/Darkwire/Protek/Acetech) USB digital signal oscilloscopes. Supported devices: 6022BE/BL. Previously this package was in rpmfusion-nonfree repo. But in version 2.07 removed all nonfree firmwares from Hantek. Please see https://github.com/OpenHantek/openhantek/issues/240 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 1711303] New: Review Request: pass-pwned - Password-Store extension for Have I Been Pwned

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711303 Bug ID: 1711303 Summary: Review Request: pass-pwned - Password-Store extension for Have I Been Pwned Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: bexelbie(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~bex/pass-pwned/pass-pwned.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~bex/pass-pwned/pass-pwned-0-20190516.git.884856... Description: Password-Store extension for Have I Been Pwned Fedora Account System Username: bex -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
31
0 / 0

[Bug 1716007] New: Review Request: R-sodium - A Modern and Easy-to-Use Crypto Library

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716007 Bug ID: 1716007 Summary: Review Request: R-sodium - A Modern and Easy-to-Use Crypto Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-sodium.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-sodium-1.1-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Bindings to 'libsodium': a modern, easy-to-use software library for encryption, decryption, signatures, password hashing and more. Sodium uses curve25519, a state-of-the-art Diffie-Hellman function by Daniel Bernstein, which has become very popular after it was discovered that the NSA had backdoored Dual EC DRBG. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 1651824] Review Request: python-elephant - Elephant is a package for analysis of electrophysiology data in Python

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> --- Looks good now: XXX APPROVED XXX! However, before you commit to SCM: - Do you think you should include mpi4py as a requires or a weak dep? This package seems to support MPI. - Please report the following issues upstream and mention the issues in the spec: * failing doc build * failing tests (not the one that tries to download files, that's OK) - Please file an issue upstream discussing the version specific requires on neo. We need to confirm what version this works with. Cheers! Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac-free - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(tcallawa(a)redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #119 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> --- As Christian noted, we have already reached out to Fraunhofer about amending their license in this specific situation, but there has been no progress on this front. Should that situation change, we can certainly apply any changes at a later point. However, I am in agreement with Christian that it is not necessary to make a license change. It is common for open source licenses to contain clauses which are not triggered, depending on the circumstances. We do not need to block on a license change in order to use the fdk-aac-free codebase in a GPL-compatible manner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac-free - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #118 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <cschalle(a)redhat.com> --- I don't think its a waste of time the way the question is framed, and I don't want to put words in Tom's mouth here, but my answer would be 'yes of course people should feel free to try to work with Fraunhofer to improve their license text if they so wishes, but to be clear we are not going to block on that'. As a sidenote I have actually asked Fraunhofer about removing the clause since its obsolete, but so far no response beyond 'will think about it'. I pinged them again today to try to see if anything has changed, but if I don't hear back on that ping or get a negative response I don't personally plan on pursuing the license rewording any further as it doesn't really matter beyond laymen license clarity, but anyone else who feels inclined should feel free IMHO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1416705] Review Request: python3-kivy - Kivy - Multimedia / Multitouch framework in Python

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705 --- Comment #26 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- Actually it existed but it's now orphaned: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-roboto-mono-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1416705] Review Request: python3-kivy - Kivy - Multimedia / Multitouch framework in Python

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705 --- Comment #25 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- - You didn't fix it as I recommended, you need to remove the shebang, not add executable bitsor change the shebang: # E: wrong-script-interpreter sed -i -e 's|#!/usr/bin/env python|#!/usr/bin/python3|g' kivy/tools/kviewer.py sed -i -e 's|#!/usr/bin/env python|#!/usr/bin/python3|g' kivy/tools/pep8checker/pep8.py sed -i -e 's|#!/usr/bin/env python|#!/usr/bin/python3|g' kivy/tools/pep8checker/pre-commit.githook # E: non-executable-script chmod a+x kivy/tools/kviewer.py chmod a+x kivy/tools/pep8checker/pep8.py chmod a+x kivy/tools/pep8checker/pre-commit.githook for lib in $(find -type f -name '*.py'); do sed '1{\@^#!@d}' $lib > $lib.new && touch -r $lib $lib.new && mv $lib.new $lib done We don't care about pre-commit.githook - I can't build the package: DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: No matching package to install: 'google-roboto-mono-fonts' DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Not all dependencies satisfied DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error: Some packages could not be found. This package does not exist. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review June 2019