September 2019 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1362130] Review Request: olpcau-abc123-fonts - A nice font for kids/readability

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362130 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Last Closed| |2019-09-17 15:37:10 --- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> --- Let's close this. Feel free to restart the process at any time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1748471] New: xtensor-python - Python bindings for xtensor

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748471 Bug ID: 1748471 Summary: xtensor-python - Python bindings for xtensor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: sguelton(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtensor-python.spec SRPM URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtensor-python-0.23.1-0.fc31.src... Description: xtensor-python enables inplace use of numpy arrays in C++ with all the benefits from xtensor: C++ universal function and broadcasting, STL-compliant APIs, A broad coverage of Numpy APIs. Fedora Account System Username: sergesanspaille -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 1751987] New: Review Rewuest: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987 Bug ID: 1751987 Summary: Review Rewuest: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: vascom2(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Vascom/svt-vp9/master/svt-vp9.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4483/37644483/svt-vp9-0-1.... Description: The Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder (SVT-VP9 Encoder) is a VP9-compliant encoder library core. The SVT-VP9 Encoder development is a work-in-progress targeting performance levels applicable to both VOD and Live encoding/transcoding video applications. The SVT-VP9 Encoder is being optimized to achieve excellent performance levels currently supporting 10 density-quality presets (please refer to the user guide for more details) on a system with a dual Intel® Xeon® Scalable processor targeting: Real-time encoding of up to two 4Kp60 streams on the Gold 6140 with M8. SVT-VP9 Encoder also supports 3 modes: A visually optimized mode for visual quality (-tune 0) An PSNR/SSIM optimized mode for PSNR / SSIM benchmarking (-tune 1 (Default setting)) An VMAF optimized mode for VMAF benchmarking (-tune 2) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 1554050] Review Request: gli - OpenGL Image (GLI)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050 --- Comment #8 from Niccolò Belli <darkbasic(a)linuxsystems.it> --- I tried your package but it doesn't build on Fedora 30 ppc64le. Does it build on COPR? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1440687] Review Request: shc - Shell script compiler

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440687 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla <gwync(a)protonmail.com> --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1441427] Review Request: smcalc - Matrix Calculator

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441427 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla <gwync(a)protonmail.com> --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/smcalc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1326504] Review Request: htslib - C library for high-throughput sequencing data formats (required for `samtools`)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504 --- Comment #21 from Dave Love <dave.love(a)manchester.ac.uk> --- (In reply to Adam Huffman from comment #16) > Dave - I could, but I'm rather out of practice. > Seems like you're more up to date with the latest guidelines than I am... I can have another look at the package and comment, but it is assigned to you, and I'd prefer more of a bioinformatics eye on it. I'm not in a good position to exercise such things. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1326504] Review Request: htslib - C library for high-throughput sequencing data formats (required for `samtools`)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504 --- Comment #20 from Jun Aruga <jaruga(a)redhat.com> --- Hi Dave, Here is the updated spec file and srpm file after your reviewing. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/junaruga/htslib-pkg/hotfix/review/htsli... SRPM URL: https://github.com/junaruga/htslib-pkg/blob/hotfix/review/htslib-1.9-1.fc... Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37675570 A test to install binary RPMs: ok A test for rpmlint. There is below warning. But I like to postpone to fix it. ``` htslib.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the- error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any- state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the- situation. ``` Below is the response for your review. > * licensecheck says Expat rather than MIT -- I haven't checked There is no "Expat" in the short name list used as "License:"'s value. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses Also below package setting "MIT" is actually detected as "Expat" by licensecheck command. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-uber-zap/blob/master/f/golang-u... I think "MIT" is fine. > * You could use %make_build in %build done. > * Remove the obsolete rm -rf from %install done > * To support EPEL, use %ldconfig_scriptlets instead of %post... done. I found a good example for that. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libmodulemd/c/75a7af962341becaa6a7076e... > * The library needs sorting out. Its soname is libhts.so.2, but it's installed as libhts.so.1.9 with a symlink to libhts.so.2. I haven't checked what's going on. The %files entry for it should be libhts.so.2*, so you know if it changes. If the version is actually taken from the release version -- I dont know -- it shouldn't be, and could be set to 0 for Fedora. I checked the upstream's behavior. ``` $ git clone git@github.com:samtools/htslib.git $ cd htslib $ git checkout 1.9 $ make $ make install prefix=$(pwd)/dist ``` `make` command creates libhts.so (actual so file) and libhts.so.2 (symbolic link to libhts.so) on the current directory. But `make install prefix=$(pwd)/dist` creates below files soname: libhts.so.1.9 and symbolic links: libhts.so and libhts.so.2. libhts.so.1.9 is the actual soname used in the binary RPM file. ``` $ ls -l dist/lib/ total 10576 -rw-r--r-- 1 jaruga jaruga 7165054 Sep 15 21:54 libhts.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 jaruga jaruga 13 Sep 15 22:01 libhts.so -> libhts.so.1.9 -rw-r--r-- 1 jaruga jaruga 3653800 Sep 15 21:55 libhts.so.1.9 lrwxrwxrwx 1 jaruga jaruga 13 Sep 15 22:01 libhts.so.2 -> libhts.so.1.9 drwxr-xr-x 2 jaruga jaruga 4096 Sep 15 22:01 pkgconfig/ ``` Do you have any concerns about this situation? I suppose that current situation is no problem. And as an additional change, as Makefile "install" task includes "install-so" task, I removed "make "install-so" command line in htslib.spec. "make install" is good enough. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 706310] Need EPEL-6 branches for LTSP

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706310 Warren Togami <wtogami(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed| |2019-09-15 19:01:17 --- Comment #19 from Warren Togami <wtogami(a)gmail.com> --- It appears the purpose of this bug was complete years ago. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1440687] Review Request: shc - Shell script compiler

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440687 --- Comment #5 from Mosaab Alzoubi <moceap(a)hotmail.com> --- Thank You -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review September 2019