October 2020 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1885042] New: Review Request: python-gettext - Python Gettext po to mo file compiler

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885042 Bug ID: 1885042 Summary: Review Request: python-gettext - Python Gettext po to mo file compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: ngompa13(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-gettext.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-gettext-4.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: This implementation of Gettext for Python 3 includes a Msgfmt class which can be used to generate compiled mo files from Gettext po files and includes support for the newer msgctxt keyword. Fedora Account System Username: ngompa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 1885034] New: Review Request: python-manatools - A Python framework to build ManaTools applications

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885034 Bug ID: 1885034 Summary: Review Request: python-manatools - A Python framework to build ManaTools applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: ngompa13(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-manatools.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-manatools-0.0.3-1.fc32.... Description: Python ManaTools aim is to help in writing tools based on libYui (SUSE widget abstraction library), to be collected under the ManaTools banner and hopefully with the same look and feel. Every output module supports the Qt, GTK, and ncurses interfaces. Fedora Account System Username: ngompa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 970972] Review Request: cuisine - Chef-like functionnality for Fabric

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970972 Package Review <package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(nils.fedora@anoth | |erhomepage.org) --- Comment #8 from Package Review <package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1876736] New: Review Request: ghc-http-client-restricted - Restricting the servers that http-client will use

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876736 Bug ID: 1876736 Summary: Review Request: ghc-http-client-restricted - Restricting the servers that http-client will use Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-http-client-restricted.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-http-client-restricted-0.0.3-1.fc32... Description: Addition to the http-client and http-client-tls libraries, that restricts the HTTP servers that can be used. This is useful when a security policy needs to eg, prevent connections to HTTP servers on localhost or a local network, or only allow connections to a specific HTTP server. It handles restricting redirects as well as the initial HTTP connection, and it also guards against DNS poisoning attacks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884 --- Comment #46 from Brandon Nielsen <nielsenb(a)jetfuse.net> --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #45) > I'm wondering whether perhaps it's not possible to split this into multiple > SPEC files and tackle each component separately? For instance, to do > msp430-elf-binutils or msp430-elf-gdb first. For instance, here the packager > focused on gdb alone: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859627 The source used for the specfile in this review is _not_ the vanilla GCC / GDB / binutils upstream, it is a bespoke version done by Mitto Systems for TI and ships GCC / GDB / binutils all in one tarball. A lot of the work has been upstreamed, but there are still differences. I could redo the work of comment #4 to document what still differs, but ultimately I think most developers would prefer using something as close as possible to what TI provides, which is why I'm not okay with the current state of the specfile, the resulting binaries would not work with Makefiles targeting the TI provided blobs (which is probably >99% of them). As mentioned above, I've been short on time to investigate this behavior. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884 --- Comment #45 from Andy Mender <andymenderunix(a)gmail.com> --- I'm wondering whether perhaps it's not possible to split this into multiple SPEC files and tackle each component separately? For instance, to do msp430-elf-binutils or msp430-elf-gdb first. For instance, here the packager focused on gdb alone: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859627 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1884598] New: Review Request: clitest - Command Line Tester

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884598 Bug ID: 1884598 Summary: Review Request: clitest - Command Line Tester Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: hegjon(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org//clitest.spec SRPM URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org//clitest-0.4.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: clitest is a portable POSIX shell script that performs automatic testing in \ Unix command lines. It's the same concept as in Python's doctest module: you document both the \ commands and their expected output, using the familiar interactive prompt \ format, and a specialized tool tests them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1878903] New: Review Request: jmol - Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903 Bug ID: 1878903 Summary: Review Request: jmol - Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganjerry(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jmol/jmol.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jmol/jmol-14.31.4-1.fc34.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: Jmol is a free, open source molecule viewer for students, educators, and researchers in chemistry and biochemistry. NOTE: The jmol package was previously in Fedora. This is a re-review due to it being absent for some months. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 1878902] New: Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 Bug ID: 1878902 Summary: Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganjerry(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/naga/naga.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/naga/naga-3.0-15.20150330git054a930.fc34.... Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: Naga aims to be a very small NIO library that provides a handful of java classes to wrap the usual Socket and ServerSocket with asynchronous NIO counterparts (similar to NIO2 planned for Java 1.7). All of this is driven from a single thread, making it useful for both client (e.g. allowing I/O to be done in the AWT-thread without any need for threads) and server programming (1 thread for all connections instead of 2 threads/connection). Internally Naga is a straightforward NIO implementation without any threads or event-queues thrown in, it is "just the NIO-stuff", to let you build things on top of it. Naga contains the code needed to get NIO up and running without having to code partially read buffers and setting various selection key flags. NOTE: The naga package was previously in Fedora. This is a re-review due to it being absent for some months. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884 Brandon Nielsen <nielsenb(a)jetfuse.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(nielsenb@jetfuse. | |net) | --- Comment #44 from Brandon Nielsen <nielsenb(a)jetfuse.net> --- No real progress. The post to the devel list went nowhere. I have been unable to modify the cross-gcc specfile to build a compiler for the MSP430 that generates a binary that runs on actual hardware. It is possible I'm not correctly compiling newlib. I have not had a chance to compare the resulting assembly versus a working compiler. Trying to get it working consumes a lot of CPU time, actual time, and disk space. I only really have the latter. Given the lack of response I've mostly abandoned the idea for now. As for this review, I still need to add the check step. I'm also still trying to figure out why the '-B/usr/bin/msp430-elf-' is required. It breaks a lot of existing Makefiles. Hopefully I'll get a chance to dig into that all more this week. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

3 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review October 2020