March 2020 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1353169] Review Request: python-nikola - A static website and blog generator

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169 --- Comment #52 from José Matos <jamatos(a)fc.up.pt> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #51) > The only remaining issue is that you're missing the following line in the > python-nikola-doc subpackage files section: > > > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{pypi_name} > > Please add that. Good catch, now on hindsight it is obvious. :-) I have added that line not to python-nikola-doc but to nikola that installs it. Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola.spec SRPM URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola-8.0.4-9.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1353169] Review Request: python-nikola - A static website and blog generator

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169 --- Comment #51 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> --- The only remaining issue is that you're missing the following line in the python-nikola-doc subpackage files section: > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{pypi_name} Please add that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1353169] Review Request: python-nikola - A static website and blog generator

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169 --- Comment #50 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/doc/nikola [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/doc/nikola [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 184320 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-nikola-8.0.4-8.fc33.noarch.rpm python-nikola-doc-8.0.4-8.fc33.noarch.rpm nikola-8.0.4-8.fc33.noarch.rpm python-nikola-8.0.4-8.fc33.src.rpm python3-nikola.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unformatted -> unformulated, formatted, unfortunate python3-nikola.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reStructuredText -> restructured Text, restructured-text, restructuring python3-nikola.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/nikola/data/samplesite/listings/hello.py 644 /usr/bin/python python3-nikola.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/nikola/packages/datecond/__init__.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python-nikola-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C python-nikola documentation python-nikola-doc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided python2-nikola python-nikola-doc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided python3-nikola nikola.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C python-nikola documentation nikola.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unformatted -> unformulated, formatted, unfortunate nikola.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reStructuredText -> restructured Text, restructured-text, restructuring python-nikola.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unformatted -> unformulated, formatted, unfortunate python-nikola.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reStructuredText -> restructured Text, restructured-text, restructuring python-nikola.src:96: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(python3-pytzlocal) 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 11 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- nikola.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C python-nikola documentation nikola.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unformatted -> unformulated, formatted, unfortunate nikola.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reStructuredText -> restructured Text, restructured-text, restructuring nikola.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://getnikola.com/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> python-nikola-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C python-nikola documentation python-nikola-doc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://getnikola.com/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> python-nikola-doc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided python2-nikola python-nikola-doc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided python3-nikola python3-nikola.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unformatted -> unformulated, formatted, unfortunate python3-nikola.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reStructuredText -> restructured Text, restructured-text, restructuring python3-nikola.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://getnikola.com/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> python3-nikola.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/nikola/data/samplesite/listings/hello.py 644 /usr/bin/python python3-nikola.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/nikola/packages/datecond/__init__.py 644 /usr/bin/env python 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 11 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/getnikola/nikola/archive/v8.0.4/nikola-8.0.4.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 558c715b5df4ec065e410a084dafb96e50291f4972e378770532e9c930768610 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 558c715b5df4ec065e410a084dafb96e50291f4972e378770532e9c930768610 Requires -------- python3-nikola (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): glyphicons-halflings-fonts python(abi) python3.8dist(babel) python3.8dist(blinker) python3.8dist(docutils) python3.8dist(doit) python3.8dist(lxml) python3.8dist(mako) python3.8dist(markdown) python3.8dist(natsort) python3.8dist(piexif) python3.8dist(pillow) python3.8dist(pygments) python3.8dist(pyrss2gen) python3.8dist(python-dateutil) python3.8dist(requests) python3.8dist(setuptools) python3.8dist(unidecode) python3.8dist(yapsy) python3dist(aiohttp) python3dist(ghp-import2) python3dist(husl) python3dist(ipykernel) python3dist(jinja2) python3dist(micawber) python3dist(notebook) python3dist(phpserialize) python3dist(pygal) python3dist(pyphen) python3dist(ruamel.yaml) python3dist(toml) python3dist(typogrify) python3dist(watchdog) python-nikola-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): nikola (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python3-nikola Provides -------- python3-nikola: bundled(python3-datecond) bundled(python3-pytzlocal) python-nikola python3-nikola python3.8dist(nikola) python3dist(nikola) python-nikola-doc: python-nikola-doc nikola: nikola Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1353169 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: PHP, R, fonts, Haskell, C/C++, Ocaml, SugarActivity, Perl, Java Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1811354] New: Review Request: rust-bodhi - Bodhi REST API client

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354 Bug ID: 1811354 Summary: Review Request: rust-bodhi - Bodhi REST API client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: decathorpe(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-bodhi.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-bodhi-0.5.7-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Bodhi REST API client Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42299495 NOTE: This package requires rust-fedora, which has only been built for rawhide today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1815778] New: Review Request: rust-dashmap - Blazing fast concurrent HashMap for Rust

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815778 Bug ID: 1815778 Summary: Review Request: rust-dashmap - Blazing fast concurrent HashMap for Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-dashmap.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-dashmap-3.7.0-1.f... Description: Blazing fast concurrent HashMap for Rust. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1353169] Review Request: python-nikola - A static website and blog generator

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169 --- Comment #49 from José Matos <jamatos(a)fc.up.pt> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #48) > Err strike that, it should be instead: > > > Source0: https://github.com/getnikola/nikola/archive/v%{version}/nikola-%{version}... New version with that change incorporated: Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola.spec SRPM URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola-8.0.4-8.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1815723] New: Review Request: rust-attohttpc - Small and lightweight HTTP client

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815723 Bug ID: 1815723 Summary: Review Request: rust-attohttpc - Small and lightweight HTTP client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-attohttpc.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-attohttpc-0.12.0-... Description: Small and lightweight HTTP client. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1789146] New: Review Request: systemd-networkd - System daemon that manages network configurations

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789146 Bug ID: 1789146 Summary: Review Request: systemd-networkd - System daemon that manages network configurations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/systemd-networkd.spec SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/systemd-networkd-244.1-1.el8.src.rpm Description: systemd-networkd is a system service that manages networks. It detects and configures network devices as they appear, as well as creating virtual network devices. Fedora Account System Username: robert Important: This package is intended to be only for EPEL 8 in order to address bug #1650342. In difference to the frozen systemd v239 in RHEL 8, which obviously does not receive any systemd-networkd patches/backports, this package shall be updated with new systemd-networkd versions to cover bug and security fixes as well as new features (I'm likely unable to perform larger backports like Red Hat is doing for systemd in general). If a reviewer thinks the package should be then called systemd-networkd-latest (or similar), please let me know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 1792741] New: Review Request: openssl11 - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792741 Bug ID: 1792741 Summary: Review Request: openssl11 - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/openssl11.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/openssl11-1.1.1c-1.el7.src.rpm Description: The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared libraries which provide various cryptographic algorithms and protocols. Fedora Account System Username: robert This package is intended only for EPEL 7 to provide some kind of forward compatibility for specific applications. RHEL 7 is only shipping the old openssl-1.0.2k-19.el7 (and it won't change that as stated in bug #1416715). So this is openssl-1.1.1c-2.el8 from RHEL 8 modified to be installable along with the regular package. The package itself was as less modified as possible to make the differences hopefully easily reviewable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 1808573] New: Review Request: python-periodictable - Extensible periodic table of the elements

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808573 Bug ID: 1808573 Summary: Review Request: python-periodictable - Extensible periodic table of the elements Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: anto.trande(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-periodictable/python-periodictab... SRPM URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-periodictable/python-periodictab... This package is for Fedora, EPEL7 and EPEL8 Fedora Account System Username: sagitter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

4 years, 1 month

1
10
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review March 2020