[Bug 1813687] aspell-sw
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813687
--- Comment #14 from Nikola Forró <nforro(a)redhat.com> ---
There is a dot missing between pkgrel and extraver.
A few more nitpicks: %aspellversion macro is not used anywhere, there is
inconsistency in case-sensitivity of BuildRequires tags.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4 years, 2 months
[Bug 1813687] aspell-sw
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813687
--- Comment #12 from Nikola Forró <nforro(a)redhat.com> ---
Well, you should remove the original changelog entry (or merge the two).
> Updated change log to "0.50-1" - I guess "0.50-0-1" would overcomplicate things since tag can be updated if there is a new language release.
Actually, if %langrelease can change independently of Version, it should be
part of Release. So the first Fedora release would be
"1.%{langrelease}%{?dist}", the second "2.%{langrelease}%{?dist}" and so on.
See [1].
[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_mo...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4 years, 2 months
[Bug 1813687] aspell-sw
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813687
--- Comment #10 from Nikola Forró <nforro(a)redhat.com> ---
You are not using macros in Source1 URL, why not?
"0.50:2004-03-29-0" in changelog is still wrong, it should be "0.50-1"? Tip: if
you set Release to "0%{?dist}" and run rpmdev-bumpspec on the spec file, it
will generate the changelog entry for you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4 years, 2 months