November 2021 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2023061] New: Review Request: libdeflate - Fast implementation of DEFLATE, zlib, and gzip

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023061 Bug ID: 2023061 Summary: Review Request: libdeflate - Fast implementation of DEFLATE, zlib, and gzip Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: dank(a)qemfd.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://nick-black.com/rpms/libdeflate.spec SRPM URL: https://nick-black.com/rpms/libdeflate-1.8-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: A fast implementation of DEFLATE, zlib, and gzip Fedora Account System Username: nickblack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023061

2 years, 6 months

1
20
0 / 0

[Bug 1931141] New: Review Request: plocate - Much faster locate

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931141 Bug ID: 1931141 Summary: Review Request: plocate - Much faster locate Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: moceap(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/plocate.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/zbyszek/plocate/fedora... Description: Much faster locate Fedora Account System Username: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2 years, 6 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 1982387] New: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - A binding for the OpenGL graphics system

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982387 Bug ID: 1982387 Summary: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - A binding for the OpenGL graphics system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-OpenGL/ghc-OpenGL.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-OpenGL/ghc-OpenGL-3.0.3.0-1... Description: A Haskell binding for the OpenGL graphics system (GL, version 4.6) and its accompanying utility library (GLU, version 1.3). OpenGL is the industry's most widely used and supported 2D and 3D graphics application programming interface (API), incorporating a broad set of rendering, texture mapping, special effects, and other powerful visualization functions. For more information about OpenGL and its various extensions, please see <http://www.opengl.org/> and <http://www.opengl.org/registry/>. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71892786 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2 years, 6 months

1
16
0 / 0

[Bug 2025138] Review Request: oclock - A simple analog clock

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138 Dan Čermák <dan.cermak(a)cgc-instruments.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. | |com Flags| |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138

2 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2025138] Review Request: oclock - A simple analog clock

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138 Dan Čermák <dan.cermak(a)cgc-instruments.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. | |com, | |package-review(a)lists.fedora | |project.org Component|oclock |Package Review QA Contact| |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |.org | --- Comment #2 from Dan Čermák <dan.cermak(a)cgc-instruments.com> --- The spec looks good to me, you should use gpgverify though as the package provides signatures (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_v...). I would also suggest to start using rpmautospec, as that will make package maintenance simpler in the long run. Package tentatively approved, provided that you start using %gpgverify. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package does not use a name that already exists. Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/oclock See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT License", "Unknown or generated", "FSF All Permissive License", "NTP License (legal disclaimer)", "NTP License (legal disclaimer) [generated file]", "FSF Unlimited License (with Retention) GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "MIT License [generated file]", "[generated file]". 14 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/dan/fedora-scm/2025138-oclock/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138

2 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2024295] New: Review Request: mingw-osgearth - MinGW Windows osgearth library

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024295 Bug ID: 2024295 Summary: Review Request: mingw-osgearth - MinGW Windows osgearth library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: manisandro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-osgearth.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-osgearth-3.2-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows osgearth library Fedora Account System Username: smani -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024295

2 years, 6 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2024130] New: Review Request: mingw-OpenSceneGraph - MinGW Windows OpenSceneGraph library

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024130 Bug ID: 2024130 Summary: Review Request: mingw-OpenSceneGraph - MinGW Windows OpenSceneGraph library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: manisandro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-OpenSceneGraph.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-OpenSceneGraph-3.6.5-1.fc36.s... Description: MinGW Windows OpenSceneGraph library Fedora Account System Username: smani Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78983666 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024130

2 years, 6 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2002418] New: Review Request: plocate - Much faster locate

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002418 Bug ID: 2002418 Summary: Review Request: plocate - Much faster locate Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/plocate.spec SRPM URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/plocate-1.1.11-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: Much faster locate Fedora Account System Username: zbyszek This is a second review request for this package. I made the initial package but Mosaab made the review request submission. But this got stalled. So I'm opening a new review to get the package approved under my account. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 years, 6 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2023514] New: Review Request: package-notes - Generate a linker script to insert .note.package section

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023514 Bug ID: 2023514 Summary: Review Request: package-notes - Generate a linker script to insert .note.package section Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/package-notes.spec SRPM URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/package-notes-0.4~0.git33c3dfa-1.2021111... Description: This package provides a generator of linker scripts that insert a section with a note with a JSON payload that describes the package the binary was built for. For https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_information_on_ELF_objects. Fedora Account System Username: zbyszek Note: I packages a snapshot version because there are some outstanding patches. The version will change to 0.4 before this is actually built in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023514

2 years, 6 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2023856] New: Review Request: rust-rbspy - Sampling CPU profiler for Ruby

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023856 Bug ID: 2023856 Summary: Review Request: rust-rbspy - Sampling CPU profiler for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcavalca(a)fb.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-rbspy/rust-rbspy.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-rbspy/rust-rbspy-0.8.1-1.fc... Description: Sampling CPU profiler for Ruby. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023856

2 years, 6 months

1
15
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review November 2021