[Bug 1858858] New: Wsdd package has incorrect firewalld settings,
needs a sysconfig option for systemd file
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858858
Bug ID: 1858858
Summary: Wsdd package has incorrect firewalld settings, needs a
sysconfig option for systemd file
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: stewart_whitman(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1701776
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1701776&action=edit
Source RPM package.
Description of problem:
1. The wsdd package that is currently available to Fedora 32 users comes with
incorrect firewalld settings. The service xml files do not allow multicast
messages through when added.
2. Also, in the systemd service file, a user needs to pass options to the
daemon - for example, the user probably needs to specify the Samba workgroup
name. In short it needs a sysconfig option.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.5-2
Additional info:
I've attach a src.rpm for wsdd 0.6.1 that contains fixes for both these issues:
1. Firewalld:
Two firewalld service files:
wsdd.xml that opens the multicast port.
wsdd-http.xml included as a service in wsdd.xml that opens the well-know TCP
port (don't know if you can merge this into a single file)
2. Options/Systemd
Add /etc/sysconfig/wsdd, and pass settings to systemd file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
3 years, 1 month
[Bug 1462467] Review Request: hollywood - Fill your console with
Hollywood melodrama techno-babble
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462467
Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.d
| |e
--- Comment #15 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de> ---
Is the package usable at all, if no 3rd-party repository is enabled? So are
then e.g. just minor features missing? If the answer is "no", the package
should IMHO get part of a 3rd-pary repository. Aside of that, the latest
version is 1.21 which might address the license workaround in the spec file?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
3 years, 1 month
[Bug 1884063] New: Review Request: python-fastapi - FastAPI
framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for
production
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884063
Bug ID: 1884063
Summary: Review Request: python-fastapi - FastAPI framework,
high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready
for production
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-fastapi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-fastapi-0.61.1-1.fc33.src...
Description: FastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code,
ready for production
Fedora Account System Username: itamarjp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
3 years, 1 month