Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de> 2008-09-07 10:40:09 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
I have to admit, it's terribly funny to "%define srcname
py" and then go on to
use "%{srcname}" in place of "py". Ten keystrokes (twelve if you
count the
shift key) to replace two? But that's your option as the maintainer.
Well, there are more reasons for defining macros than solely reducing the
number of keystrokes. Normally I use %{name} e.g. for the Url and Source tags,
but in case of python packages %{name} doesn't work because of the leading
'python-', that's why there is %{srcname}.
Anyway, I removed %{srcname} here.
0.9.2 came out the same day you opened this ticket; did you want to
update the
package?
Thanks for the hint. Updating the package indeed simplified packaging a bit,
because upstream made some efforts towards a clean install using setuptools.
With a license like that, you really need to be more specific about
which parts
have which license. Otherwise the poor reviewer has to repeat the entire
process you used to figure out the licensing information along with anyone who
may maintain it in the future.
The specfile now has a more detailed list wrt licensing.
Spec URL:
http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py.spec
SRPM URL:
http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py-0.9.2-1.fc9.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sun Sep 7 2008 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de> - 0.9.2-1
- Update to 0.9.2.
- Upstream now uses setuptools and installs to %%{python_sitearch}.
- Remove %%{srcname} macro.
- More detailed information about licenses.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.