Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Blocks| |182235
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2008-11-09 10:40:14
EDT ---
Umm...
spot, would you answer my question below?
! First of all please unpack passenger-2.0.3.gem in the srpm by below:
$ mkdir TMP ; cd TMP
$ tar xf ../*gem (gem can be unpacked by tar)
$ mkdir TMP ; cd TMP
$ tar xzf ../data.tar.gz
Then:
First of all, the overall license this package is GPLv2 (not GPLv2+)
Then ext/apache2/LICENSE-CNRI.TXT says:
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
A few functions in ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp are based on the source code of
mod_scgi version 1.9. Its license is included in this file.
Please note that these licensing terms *only* encompass those few
functions, and not Passenger as a whole.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CNRI OPEN SOURCE LICENSE AGREEMENT
(CNRI = Python 1.6 i.e. GPL incompatible license follows)
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
What I am in trouble is that
- What functions in ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp are actually based on mod_scgi codes
- And I don't know for now how these functions are used in the other parts
of passenger source codes
- So I am not sure if the code in Hooks.cpp under CNRI license won't conflict
with GPL.
spot, how do you think about this. For me the current status seems very
obscure.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.