https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
Lyes Saadi fedora@lyes.eu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |fedora@lyes.eu Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC| |fedora@lyes.eu
--- Comment #2 from Lyes Saadi fedora@lyes.eu --- Will take this first. I'll look into the second package I owe you after this one. I will review it tomorrow though, since it's 4:40 where I am ^^' !
Just a quick note on this having the same name as an old asl package, I am a bit confused about what procedure this should follow? My best guess is that it should technically follow the unretirement process and also follow https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-repla... and obsolete the old version, as per :
If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a sufficiently compatible replacement as defined above, use only the Obsoletes: line from the above example.
Although, I am a bit confused about what obsolete would do in this situation... I'll dig further into it tomorrow.