Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696
Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa(a)redhat.c
| |om)
Bug 470696 depends on bug 470694, which changed state.
Bug 470694 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web
frameworks, web servers and layers of software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #16 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com> 2008-12-11 19:13:08
EDT ---
I've contacted both upstream for CNRI as well as Phusion Passenger;
= CNRI =
I've requested taking into consideration re-licensing the original mod_scgi
code-base to a GPLv2-compatible license, and they promised me to have their CEO
look into it. Should they choose to do so, I think that would kill both birds
with one stone, wouldn't it?
= Phusion Passenger =
They are considering re-licensing Phusion Passenger (thus rubygem-passenger) to
the MIT license. Would that solve the incompatibility issue? And, would that
make the package's license acceptable for inclusion in Fedora/EPEL?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.