https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292
Julio Gonzalez Gil <julio(a)juliogonzalez.es> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |julio(a)juliogonzalez.es
Flags| |needinfo?(andrew(a)gaul.org)
--- Comment #31 from Julio Gonzalez Gil <julio(a)juliogonzalez.es> ---
I can take care of this if Jorge is not willing to continue.
We could say that I continued Jorge's work somehow at
https://github.com/juliogonzalez/s3fs-fuse-rpm, so I guess preparing my current
SPEC for Fedora should not be that hard after some cleaning up, and adapting to
the Fedora policies (and learning how to submit, since I am a SUSE guy and I am
not yet familiar with how things work at Fedora :-)
@A(In reply to Andrew Gaul from comment #29)
I contribute to s3fs; is there anything I could do to move this
along? s3fs
has been releasing versions for the past few years and now Ubuntu packages
it as "s3fs".
As far as I can see
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fuse-s3fs/blob/master/f/fuse-s3fs.spec does
not provide s3fs, so there should not be a conflict if we pick up this name.
But to have all the alternatives covered before I contact Norman: Andrew, would
be fine using the naming s3fs-fuse for the package if s3fs is still being used
somehow?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component