https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796271
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com --- (In reply to Iñaki Ucar from comment #5)
- The devel subpackage misses the %{?_isa} flag in "Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}".
Good catch. Added.
- Why is the sourceview3 subpackage named without the gtk prefix?
Because I want the subpackage names to match the opam names. If you look inside the build directory, you will find these files: - lablgtk3.opam - lablgtk3-gtkspell3.opam - lablgtk3-sourceview3.opam
Hence the subpackages are named gtkspell3 and sourceview3. Yes, it seems inconsistent, but that's what upstream chose.
- The examples directory is cleaned up, but it's not installed. Not sure if
this is intentional.
I started work on packaging the examples, decided I didn't really want to package them after all, then forgot to remove that. I have removed it now.
And now the package is failing to build in mock, with a segfault. I'm not sure what changed. I got a clean build when I filed the original review request. I will have to track this down before I can make a new SRPM.