https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- (In reply to Francesco Frassinelli (frafra) from comment #4)
It seems to work. Maybe it should be included under a different %package.
Spec URL: https://frafra.fedorapeople.org/copr/xxhsum.spec SRPM URL: https://frafra.fedorapeople.org/copr/xxhsum-42-2.fc23.src.rpm
Yes, Thanks!
xxhsum is under GPLv2+ license instead libxxhash and licensed BSD see the heder of the .c/.h files
Strange problem with cmake macros ...
can add to the spec file this part?
%package -n libxxhash License: BSD Summary: %{name} Shared Libraries
%description -n libxxhash This package contains %{name} Shared Libraries
%package -n libxxhash-devel License: BSD Summary: Development files for libxxhash Requires: libxxhash%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
%description -n libxxhash-devel The libxxhash-devel package contains libraries and header files for developing applications that use libxxhash
%files -n libxxhash %{_libdir}/libxxhash.so.* %license LICENSE
%files -n libxxhash-devel %{_includedir}/xxhash.h %{_libdir}/libxxhash.so %license LICENSE
because xxhsum do not require libxxhash
thanks