https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@redhat.com Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa@redhat.com --- Using a comment to declare the license on a spec file to be GPLv3+ is perfectly acceptable. The intent of the FPCA is to provide a blanket default license for all contributed works (including spec files) where the contributor does not specify a license. Since you've specified a license, this does not apply. Your choice of license (GPLv3+) is perfectly acceptable to Fedora.
Lifting FE-Legal.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker