Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732
------- Additional Comments From dlutter@redhat.com 2007-01-17 14:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)
Issues:
- Should there really be a devel subpackage just for docs?
If there does need to be one for some reason it should Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, but I don't see a reason to have one, unless I am missing something...
The main reason why I did that is because the docs wind up being several times the size of the actual library; and they are only of interest to developers. But if you think saving space/bandwidth this way is a bad idea, I'll put them into the main package.
- Should the 'Requires: gamin' be needed?
rpm already puts in a requires on libfam.so.0 which is provided by the gamin package.
You are right - I removed that explicit dependency.
New stuff: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-fam.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-fam-0.2.0-2.src.rpm