https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870522
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com --- Thanks for the comments, Ivan.
(In reply to comment #1)
Drop BR ocaml (ocaml-ocamldoc will pull it when building)
It is redundant, true, but I prefer to keep that particular BR since this is an ocaml package, so having an explicit BR on the package that provides the compiler and runtime seems like a good thing to me.
Ise %{?_isa} for devel subpackage https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
Good catch. I have fixed this.
static library must be in static subpackage https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
Except for the case of OCaml packages. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OCaml, and the section entitled "-devel subpackage" in particular.
New URLs: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-zarith/ocaml-zarith.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-zarith/ocaml-zarith-1.1-2.fc19.src.rpm