Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: meshlab - A system for processing and editing unstructured 3D triangular meshes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Summary: Review Request: meshlab - A system for processing and editing unstructured 3D triangular meshes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric@brouhaha.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/meshlab/meshlab.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/meshlab/meshlab-1.2.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build for F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1960193
Description: MeshLab is an open source, portable, and extensible system for the processing and editing of unstructured 3D triangular meshes. The system is aimed to help the processing of the typical not-so-small unstructured models arising in 3D scanning, providing a set of tools for editing, cleaning, healing, inspecting, rendering and converting these kinds of meshes.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Martin Gieseking martin.gieseking@uos.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking@uos.de
--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking martin.gieseking@uos.de 2010-04-01 04:58:54 EDT --- Hi Eric,
you've done a good job setting up this big package. Here are a couple of things I've noticed so far:
- change the Source0 URL to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%%7Bname%7D/MeshLabSrc_v122.tar.gz (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net)
- the following doc files use the ISO-8859-1 character set: meshlab/docs/contrib_Gangemi_Vannini.txt meshlab/docs/contrib_Buzzelli_Mazzanti.txt
convert them to UTF-8, e.g. with: cd meshlab/docs/ for f in contrib_Gangemi_Vannini.txt contrib_Buzzelli_Mazzanti.txt; do iconv -fiso88591 -tutf8 $f >$f.new touch -r $f $f.new mv $f.new $f done
- I suggest to add trailing slashes after folder names in the %files section: %{_libdir}/meshlab/ %{_datadir}/meshlab/ This way it's easier to see that directories are added and not single files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #2 from Eric Smith eric@brouhaha.com 2010-04-06 20:49:31 EDT --- Thanks for the suggestions. I've updated the spec.
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/meshlab/meshlab.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/meshlab/meshlab-1.2.2-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build for F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2098669
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2010-04-07 03:32:47 EDT --- Note that you can use %{_qt4_qmake} to call QT4 qmake.
The %{_mandir}/man1/* looks a bit dangerous, please be more specific. For instance %{_mandir}/man1/*.1.* would already be a lot better.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #4 from Eric Smith eric@brouhaha.com 2010-04-07 10:58:48 EDT --- Thanks for the suggestions. I've updated the spec.
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/meshlab/meshlab.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/meshlab/meshlab-1.2.2-3.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking martin.gieseking@uos.de 2010-04-28 15:12:13 EDT --- The tarball contains a copy of getopt (/vcglib/wrap/system/getopt.*). As far as I see, it's not used but you should remove it in the %prep section to be sure.
The source files in meshlab/src/meshlabplugins/filter_poisson/src are licensed under a variant of the BSD license. Some of the shaders are also licensed under BSD. Hence, the license of the package is "GPLv2+ and BSD".
The license file meshlab/src/meshlabplugins/filter_poisson/license.txt must be added to %doc.
Finally, there's a typo in a comment of the spec file: backage => package :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #6 from Eric Smith eric@brouhaha.com 2010-05-04 09:19:58 EDT --- Updated again per your suggestions, thanks!
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/meshlab/meshlab.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/meshlab/meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking martin.gieseking@uos.de 2010-05-11 05:22:43 EDT --- Upstream has released meshlab version 1.2.3. Would you like to update the package? If nobody else volunteers to do the formal review, I'll do it as soon as my time permits.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #8 from Eric Smith eric@brouhaha.com 2010-05-12 02:51:40 EDT --- The new upstream tarball looks like quite a mess. There seem to be redundant copies of sources in various directories. I'm not sure what's going on there.
I'll have to try to package the tsai library first.
There's a bunch of stuff out of "Structure Synth", but it looks like the upstream of that doesn't build it as a library, so I'm not sure whether to try to do that.
If you don't mind reviewing 1.2.2, I'd like to push forward with that while I work on 1.2.3.
Thanks! Eric
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Martin Gieseking martin.gieseking@uos.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking@uos.de Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking martin.gieseking@uos.de 2010-05-12 13:55:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8)
If you don't mind reviewing 1.2.2, I'd like to push forward with that while I work on 1.2.3.
That's OK for me. I checked everything again, and couldn't find any further things to be fixed. The package looks fine now.
$ rpmlint meshlab-*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--------------------------------- keys used in following checklist:
[+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work ---------------------------------
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. $ md5sum MeshLabSrc_v122.tar.gz* f06107dd01cbe0d6519dbb759ae84c11 MeshLabSrc_v122.tar.gz f06107dd01cbe0d6519dbb759ae84c11 MeshLabSrc_v122.tar.gz.1
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2183294
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix ... [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. [+] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock (but it takes ages :)
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [.] SHOULD: Subpackages other than devel should require the base package. [.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
---------------- Package APPROVED ----------------
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Eric Smith eric@brouhaha.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Eric Smith eric@brouhaha.com 2010-05-12 17:56:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: meshlab Short Description: A system for processing and editing unstructured 3D triangular meshes Owners: brouhaha Branches: F-12 F-13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us 2010-05-13 18:30:12 EDT --- CVS Done
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 19:36:31 EDT --- meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 19:36:25 EDT --- meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-15 16:34:34 EDT --- meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-15 16:41:21 EDT --- meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc13 |meshlab-1.2.2-4.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
Eric Smith eric@brouhaha.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #16 from Eric Smith eric@brouhaha.com 2012-03-12 15:17:25 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: meshlab New Branches: el6 Owners: brouhaha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561243
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com 2012-03-12 15:51:10 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org