https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |puntogil(a)libero.it Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |puntogil(a)libero.it Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms&gt; --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1) Can we unbundle? I based on your spec file. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it&gt; --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Apache (v2.0)", "GPL (v2)", "Unknown or generated". 630 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1357204-jmockit/licensecheck.txt BSD: ./main/src/mockit/external/asm/* GPLv2 with exceptions: ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AgentInitializationException.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AgentLoadException.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AttachNotSupportedException.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AttachPermission.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/VirtualMachine.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/VirtualMachineDescriptor.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/spi/AttachProvider.java ./main/src/sun/tools/attach/BsdVirtualMachine.java ./main/src/sun/tools/attach/HotSpotVirtualMachine.java ./main/src/sun/tools/attach/LinuxVirtualMachine.java ./main/src/sun/tools/attach/SolarisVirtualMachine.java ./main/src/sun/tools/attach/WindowsVirtualMachine.java [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. These files are part of objectweb-asm package: ./main/src/mockit/external/asm/* These files are part of JDK: ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AgentInitializationException.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AgentLoadException.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AttachNotSupportedException.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AttachPermission.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/VirtualMachine.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/VirtualMachineDescriptor.java ./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/spi/AttachProvider.java ./main/src/sun/tools/attach/HotSpotVirtualMachine.java ./main/src/sun/tools/attach/LinuxVirtualMachine.java [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Java: [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build [x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is pulled in by maven-local [x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils [x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink) Maven: [x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even when building with ant [x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping [x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used [x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage- utils for %update_maven_depmap macro [x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jmockit- coverage , jmockit-javadoc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Java: [x]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.) [x]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: jmockit-1.19-1.20150623git3203901.fc25.noarch.rpm jmockit-coverage-1.19-1.20150623git3203901.fc25.noarch.rpm jmockit-javadoc-1.19-1.20150623git3203901.fc25.noarch.rpm jmockit-1.19-1.20150623git3203901.fc25.src.rpm jmockit.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US testability -> test ability, test-ability, incontestability jmockit.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib jmockit-coverage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US overridable -> irrecoverable jmockit-coverage.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib jmockit-coverage.noarch: W: no-documentation jmockit.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US testability -> test ability, test-ability, incontestability 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- jmockit.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US testability -> test ability, test-ability, incontestability jmockit.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib jmockit-coverage.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US overridable -> irrecoverable jmockit-coverage.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib jmockit-coverage.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Requires -------- jmockit (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java java-headless javapackages-tools mvn(javax.inject:javax.inject) mvn(org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec) jmockit-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): javapackages-tools jmockit-coverage (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): java-headless javapackages-tools Provides -------- jmockit: jmockit mvn(org.jmockit:jmockit) mvn(org.jmockit:jmockit:pom:) jmockit-javadoc: jmockit-javadoc jmockit-coverage: jmockit-coverage mvn(org.jmockit:jmockit-coverage) mvn(org.jmockit:jmockit-coverage:pom:) Source checksums ---------------- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmockit/jmockit.github.io/master/api1x/... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 9447da9bf7e69c4bdc133b09dbd9784fcd476ffdd821268c784c3e12c9698082 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 9447da9bf7e69c4bdc133b09dbd9784fcd476ffdd821268c784c3e12c9698082 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmockit/jmockit.github.io/master/api1x/... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 1bd7e17fe3d51bcd775fff086f66b19fc97a2f467248f382d8310c6b114c4d5e CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 1bd7e17fe3d51bcd775fff086f66b19fc97a2f467248f382d8310c6b114c4d5e https://github.com/jmockit/jmockit1/archive/320390106be6b4ae9e602be5cb40c... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 12192d036afb8021384f71a0543006bf586f95e40176ed3d0d2f6cd27c03bc6b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 12192d036afb8021384f71a0543006bf586f95e40176ed3d0d2f6cd27c03bc6b Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1357204 --plugins Java -m fedora-rawhide-i386 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it&gt; --- Created attachment 1180493 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1180493&action=edit licensecheck.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms&gt; --- We should make the tests work, and see if we can use the latest version of jmockit with JUnit5. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 --- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it&gt; --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #9) Have no time for J5 now, is available a new milestone (r5.0.0-M3) but we could try to import only after https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397307 will be solved. This is a list of some not available dependencies: de.schauderhaft.degraph:degraph-check:0.1.4 This and a list of dependencies what should be updated: net.sf.jopt-simple:jopt-simple:5.0.3 org.assertj:assertj-core:3.6.0 org.mockito:mockito-core:2.2.22 org.spockframework:spock-core:1.0-groovy-2.4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290790 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Tracking Depends On| |1397307, 1290790 Summary|Review Request: jmockit - |Review Request: jmockit - |Java toolkit for |Java toolkit for |unit/integration testing |unit/integration testing [+ | |dependencies tracker] Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290790 [Bug 1290790] spock-1.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397307 [Bug 1397307] Gradle 3.2.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 Michael Simacek <msimacek(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1442391 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442391 [Bug 1442391] gradle-4.2.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 Bug 1357204 depends on bug 1290790, which changed state. Bug 1290790 Summary: spock-1.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290790 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204 Mat Booth <mat.booth(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component