[Bug 1735762] New: Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
7:16 a.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Bug ID: 1735762
Summary: Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC
network
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/SPEC/fc_txptd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/fc_txptd-0.1-1.fc28.s...
Description: The purpose of this daemon is to add FC network intelligence in
host and host intelligence in FC network. This daemon would inter operate with
Brocade FC fabric in order to improve the response time of the MPIO fail over.
In future, it can also collect the congestion related details and perform
workload analysis, and provide QOS at application level by inter operating with
application performance profiling software.
Fedora Account System Username: muneendra
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
7:20 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
11:08 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |zebob.m(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} → %make_install
- License seems to be MIT in the headers:
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/fpin_main.c
Not GPL. Please ask upstream for a separate license file
- No:
%dir /%{_sysdir}/systemd/system
/%{_sysdir}/systemd/system/fctxpd.service
Use:
%{_unitdir}/fctxpd.service
You also need to add the SystemD scriptlets, see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#Sys...
BuildRequires: systemd-rpm-macros
[…]
%post
%systemd_post fctxpd.service
%preun
%systemd_preun fctxpd.service
%postun
%systemd_postun_with_restart fctxpd.service
- /sbin/fctxpd → %{_sbindir}/fctxpd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5:29 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #2 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} → %make_install
- License seems to be MIT in the headers:
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/fpin_main.c
Not GPL. Please ask upstream for a separate license file
- No:
%dir /%{_sysdir}/systemd/system
/%{_sysdir}/systemd/system/fctxpd.service
Use:
%{_unitdir}/fctxpd.service
You also need to add the SystemD scriptlets, see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#Sys...
BuildRequires: systemd-rpm-macros
[…]
%post
%systemd_post fctxpd.service
%preun
%systemd_preun fctxpd.service
%postun
%systemd_postun_with_restart fctxpd.service
- /sbin/fctxpd → %{_sbindir}/fctxpd
Thanks for the feedback.
I will update the changes accordingly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4:08 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #3 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> ---
Hi All,
I have addressed the review comments and the details of SPEC and SRPM are
available in the below path.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/SPEC/fc_txptd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/fc_txptd-0.1-1.fc28.s...
Regards,
Muneendra.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4:30 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
- %global _sysdir usr/lib is not needed anymore
- please separate your %changelog entries by a newline
- the archive seems corrupted, please check the Source URL. Also if you
package the "master" tip, you should link to the commit:
%global commit f6f9e112f016089709cfd15b33df5ab0996e5c08
%global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
%global snapshotdate 20190812
Name: fc_txptd
Version: 0.1
Release: 1.%{snapshotdate}git%{shortcommit}%{?dist}
Summary: Fibrechannel transport daemon
License: GPLv2+
URL: https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/
Source0: %{url}/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.tar.gz
[…]
%prep
%autosetup -n %{name}-%{commit}
Although you should tag a Release in Github, it would be better. Also you
shouldn't upload binaries like fc_txptd-0.1.tar.gz and
fc_txptd-0.1-1.fc28.src.rpm to your GIT repo. Upload them to 3rd party hosting
service if you need to reference them here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6:44 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #5 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4)
- %global _sysdir usr/lib is not needed anymore
- please separate your %changelog entries by a newline
- the archive seems corrupted, please check the Source URL. Also if you
package the "master" tip, you should link to the commit:
%global commit f6f9e112f016089709cfd15b33df5ab0996e5c08
%global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
%global snapshotdate 20190812
Name: fc_txptd
Version: 0.1
Release: 1.%{snapshotdate}git%{shortcommit}%{?dist}
Summary: Fibrechannel transport daemon
License: GPLv2+
URL: https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/
Source0: %{url}/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.tar.gz
[…]
%prep
%autosetup -n %{name}-%{commit}
Although you should tag a Release in Github, it would be better. Also you
shouldn't upload binaries like fc_txptd-0.1.tar.gz and
fc_txptd-0.1-1.fc28.src.rpm to your GIT repo. Upload them to 3rd party
hosting service if you need to reference them here.
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the review.
As you mentioned above i have removed the fc_txptd-0.1.tar.gz and
fc_txptd-0.1-1.fc28.src.rpm from the GIT repo.
Sorry iam new to the packaging and have couple of queries on the same.
In the below link it was mentioned that
If you have no place to put your spec and SRPM then i can place the same in
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
As per the above doc i have created a project
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/muneendra/fctxpd/
And build the package for few distributions.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/muneendra/fctxpd/build/998427/
Can i mention spec URL and SRPM URL as below . Is this right way.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/SPEC/fc_txptd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/muneendra/fctxpd/srpm-bui...
Any inputs here will help me a lot.
Regards,
Muneendra.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
9:35 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
Yes, COPR is fine.
- Builds failed for me because the archive downloaded has a different root
folder, so the folder should be changed in autosetup:
%prep
%autosetup -n bsn-fc-txptd-%{commit}
- Another issue is the %changelog entry:
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-1
['0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31', '0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67']
It must reflect the Version-Release from the header, so:
*Mon Aug 12 2019 Muneendra <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> -
0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67
The rest of the SPEC is fine.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2 or later)", "*No
copyright*
GNU General Public License (v2)". 9 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/fc_txptd/review-fc_txptd/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in fc_txptd
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: fc_txptd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31.x86_64.rpm
fc_txptd-debuginfo-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31.x86_64.rpm
fc_txptd-debugsource-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31.x86_64.rpm
fc_txptd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31.src.rpm
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fibrechannel -> Channelize
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US failover -> fail over,
fail-over, spillover
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-1
['0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31', '0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67']
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fctxpd
fc_txptd-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fc -> cf, dc, f
fc_txptd-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) txptd
fc_txptd-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fc -> cf,
dc, f
fc_txptd-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US txptd
fc_txptd-debugsource.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fc -> cf, dc, f
fc_txptd-debugsource.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) txptd
fc_txptd-debugsource.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fc -> cf,
dc, f
fc_txptd-debugsource.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US txptd
fc_txptd.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fibrechannel -> Channelize
fc_txptd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US failover -> fail over,
fail-over, spillover
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
3:33 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #7 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
Yes, COPR is fine.
- Builds failed for me because the archive downloaded has a different root
folder, so the folder should be changed in autosetup:
%prep
%autosetup -n bsn-fc-txptd-%{commit}
- Another issue is the %changelog entry:
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-1
['0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31', '0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67']
It must reflect the Version-Release from the header, so:
*Mon Aug 12 2019 Muneendra <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> -
0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67
The rest of the SPEC is fine.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2 or later)", "*No
copyright*
GNU General Public License (v2)". 9 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/fc_txptd/review-fc_txptd/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in fc_txptd
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: fc_txptd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31.x86_64.rpm
fc_txptd-debuginfo-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31.x86_64.rpm
fc_txptd-debugsource-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31.x86_64.rpm
fc_txptd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31.src.rpm
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fibrechannel -> Channelize
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US failover -> fail
over, fail-over, spillover
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-1
['0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31', '0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67']
fc_txptd.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fctxpd
fc_txptd-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fc -> cf, dc, f
fc_txptd-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) txptd
fc_txptd-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fc -> cf,
dc, f
fc_txptd-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US txptd
fc_txptd-debugsource.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fc -> cf, dc, f
fc_txptd-debugsource.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) txptd
fc_txptd-debugsource.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fc ->
cf, dc, f
fc_txptd-debugsource.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US txptd
fc_txptd.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fibrechannel -> Channelize
fc_txptd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US failover -> fail over,
fail-over, spillover
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.
Hi Robert,
I have made the changes and build the package for few distributions.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/muneendra/fctxpd/build/1001203/
And below is the links for the updated Spec and SRPM URL
Spec URL:
https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/SPEC/fc_txptd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/muneendra/fctxpd/srpm-bui...
Regards,
Muneendra.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6:48 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
Looks good to me, package is approved.
You still need to find a sponsor, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
9:16 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd- This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
Sponsored.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
9:16 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Review Request: fctxpd- |Review Request: fctxpd -
|This daemon adds FC network |This daemon adds FC network
|intelligence in host and |intelligence in host and
|host intelligence in FC |host intelligence in FC
|network |network
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
9:13 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla <gwync(a)protonmail.com> ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
3:59 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppisar(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
The spec file name does not match the package name. Please pick up one and redo
the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5:14 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #12 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> ---
Hi Robert,
Updated the spec and SRPM as the package name and the spec file does not match.
I have made the changes and build the package for few distributions.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/muneendra/fctxpd/build/1027382/
And below is the links for the updated Spec and SRPM URL
Spec URL:https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/SPEC/fctxpd.spec
SRPM
URL:https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/muneendra/fctxpd/epel...
Regards,
Muneendra.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5:43 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #13 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> ---
THis is the change i did.
rename from fc_txptd.spec to fctxpd.spec
and in spec file i made the below change
-Name: fc_txptd
+Name: fctxpd
Version: 0.1
Release: 1.%{snapshotdate}git%{shortcommit}%{?dist}
Summary: Fibrechannel transport daemo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6:07 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |decathorpe(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> ---
Is the missing second "t" on purpose?
I mean fctxp(t)d. It's there in the upstream name and the original package
name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6:15 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #15 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> ---
Is the missing second "t" on purpose?
>Yes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6:27 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #16 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) <muneendra.kumar(a)broadcom.com> ---
This was the mistake which i did while creating the upstream name and the
original package name(fc_txptd).
It should be fctxpd.
Sorry for the mistake.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
12:04 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2019-3b88c02582 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3b88c02582
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5:51 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3b88c02582
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
7:09 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2019-09-14 00:09:38
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
11:33 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4:12 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b998644b53 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b998644b53
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
8:45 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b998644b53
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6:07 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-513373fe60 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-513373fe60
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
11:01 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-513373fe60
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
12:28 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6:43 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network
intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
1648
days inactive
1723
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
28 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com