https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806539 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com&gt; --- - Requires: hicolor-icon-theme - Own: /usr/share/gnome-panel, /usr/share/gnome-panel/applets - Fix the changelog entry: gnome-applets.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1:3.34.0-4 ['3.34.0-4.fc33', '3.34.0-4'] - Split the doc into a noarch doc subpackage Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/help/ast, /usr/share/help/mk, /usr/share/gnome-panel, /usr/share/gnome-panel/applets [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. Note: No (noreplace) in %config /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.gnome.CPUFreqSelector.conf [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 122880 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 22937600 bytes in /usr/share gnome- applets-3.34.0-4.fc33.x86_64.rpm:22937600 See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_... [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: gnome-applets-3.34.0-4.fc33.x86_64.rpm gnome-applets-debuginfo-3.34.0-4.fc33.x86_64.rpm gnome-applets-debugsource-3.34.0-4.fc33.x86_64.rpm gnome-applets-3.34.0-4.fc33.src.rpm gnome-applets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US accessx -> access, access x gnome-applets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US charpick -> char pick, char-pick, handpick gnome-applets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpu -> CPU, cup, cu gnome-applets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpufreq -> frequency gnome-applets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsound -> lib sound, lib-sound, libidinous gnome-applets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US modemlights -> modem lights, modem-lights, moonlights gnome-applets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stickynotes -> sticky notes, sticky-notes, stickiness gnome-applets.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US windowpicker -> window picker, window-picker, windowpane gnome-applets.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1:3.34.0-4 ['3.34.0-4.fc33', '3.34.0-4'] gnome-applets.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.gnome.CPUFreqSelector.conf gnome-applets.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sound/events/battstat_applet.soundlist gnome-applets.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cpufreq-selector gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US accessx -> access, access x gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US battstat -> battalion gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US charpick -> char pick, char-pick, handpick gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpu -> CPU, cup, cu gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpufreq -> frequency gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US drivemount -> drive mount, drive-mount, demount gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geyes -> gees, eyes, genes gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gweather -> weather, g weather, heather gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsound -> lib sound, lib-sound, libidinous gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US modemlights -> modem lights, modem-lights, moonlights gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multiload -> multicolored gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stickynotes -> sticky notes, sticky-notes, stickiness gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trashapplet -> trash applet, trash-applet, trappable gnome-applets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US windowpicker -> window picker, window-picker, windowpane 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 26 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806539 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806539 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- FEDORA-2020-e78e2c2583 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-e78e2c2583 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e78e2c2583 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806539 Bug 1806539 depends on bug 1806544, which changed state. Bug 1806544 Summary: Review Request: gnome-panel - GNOME Flashback panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806544 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component