[Bug 1805886] New: Review Request: sil-dai-banna-fonts - A font family for rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai)
11:05 a.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805886
Bug ID: 1805886
Summary: Review Request: sil-dai-banna-fonts - A font family
for rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/f...
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/f...
Description:
Dai Banna includes a complete set of New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai)
consonants, vowels, tones, and digits, along with punctuation and other useful
symbols. A basic set of Latin glyphs, including Arabic numerals, is also
provided.
The New Tai Lue script is used by approximately 300 000 people who speak the
Xishuangbanna Dai language in Yunnan, China. It is a simplification of the Tai
Tham (Old Tai Lue) script as used for this language for hundreds of years.
The Dai News Department of Xishuangbanna Daily provided valuable advice during
the development of this font family. Xishuangbanna Daily, established in 1957,
is the largest newspaper company in Yunnan, China that publishes in the New Tai
Lue script.
Fedora Account System Username: nim
One of SIL’s Non-Roman Script Initiative font families
https://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=Home
SIL is a specialist of rare human scripts and contributes its expertise to the
Unicode consortium. The objective is to get 100% of SIL’s font catalog in
Fedora to improve our i18n coverage.
Due to $#@= variations on how SIL publishes its fonts, the spec uses some
SIL-specific macros to hide those variations and limit the changes between the
specs of SIL fonts.
The packaging conforms to https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/935
as approved by FPC on 2020-02-13.
It is one of the test packages that were used to refine the new packaging
guidelines
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/
The new fonts packaging build chain is now live in koji. For example:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1468243
If the review is fast enough the package may make the FC32 100% Code Complete
Deadline (2020-02-25)
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
11:06 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1805886] Review Request: sil-dai-banna-fonts - A font family
for rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805886
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org,
| |petersen(a)redhat.com,
| |pnemade(a)redhat.com,
| |tagoh(a)redhat.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5:41 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1805886] Review Request: sil-dai-banna-fonts - A font family
for rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805886
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|pnemade(a)redhat.com |panemade(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Review:
Not going for full package review.
This package follows new fonts packaging guidelines.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: sil-dai-banna-fonts-2.200-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc-2.200-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
sil-dai-banna-fonts-2.200-1.fc33.src.rpm
sil-dai-banna-fonts.noarch: E: summary-too-long C Dai Banna SIL, a font family
for rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai) characters
sil-dai-banna-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
Xishuangbanna -> Shijiazhuang
sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C
sil-dai-banna-fonts optional documentation files
sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This package
provides optional documentation files shipped with sil-dai-banna-fonts.
sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc/DaiBannaSIL.pdf
sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc/sample.txt
sil-dai-banna-fonts.src: E: summary-too-long C Dai Banna SIL, a font family for
rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai) characters
sil-dai-banna-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Xishuangbanna
-> Shijiazhuang
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings.
Source checksums
----------------
https://software.sil.org/downloads/r/daibanna/DaiBanna-2.200.zip :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
bab67e560484ee9bc041d1e95ae2e36a08ceb9cde6800ef032381fae0700f691
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
bab67e560484ee9bc041d1e95ae2e36a08ceb9cde6800ef032381fae0700f691
Requires
--------
sil-dai-banna-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
config(sil-dai-banna-fonts)
fontpackages-filesystem
sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides
--------
sil-dai-banna-fonts:
config(sil-dai-banna-fonts)
font(daibannasilbook)
font(daibannasillight)
metainfo()
metainfo(org.fedoraproject.sil-dai-banna-fonts.metainfo.xml)
sil-dai-banna-fonts
sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc:
sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc
All other things like license, config, metainfo files looks good.
Issues:
1) Fix rpmlint issues before import of this package
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
8:26 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1805886] Review Request: sil-dai-banna-fonts - A font family
for rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805886
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> ---
Thanks for the review!
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22399
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
8:30 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1805886] Review Request: sil-dai-banna-fonts - A font family
for rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805886
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> ---
uchardet detects /usr/share/doc/sil-dai-banna-fonts-doc/sample.txt as UTF-8, so
something weird is going in rpmlint’s encoding detection
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
8:31 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1805886] Review Request: sil-dai-banna-fonts - A font family
for rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805886
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla <gwync(a)protonmail.com> ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sil-dai-banna-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
2:15 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1805886] Review Request: sil-dai-banna-fonts - A font family
for rendering New Tai Lue (Xishuangbanna Dai)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805886
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed| |2020-02-25 20:15:10
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> ---
Done for FC32 and FC33
The FC32 probably missed the deadline and will be available as an update
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
1546
days inactive
1550
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
6 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com