Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 Bug 796201 depends on bug 790553, which changed state. Bug 790553 Summary: Review Request: xsom - XML Schema Object Model (XSOM) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790553 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 Bug 796201 depends on bug 794725, which changed state. Bug 794725 Summary: Review Request: txw2 - Typed XML writer for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794725 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 Juan Hernández <juan.hernandez(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |760204 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 Juan Hernández <juan.hernandez(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |800720 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 Bug 796201 depends on bug 790564, which changed state. Bug 790564 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-fastinfoset - Fast Infoset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790564 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 --- Comment #3 from Andy Grimm <agrimm(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-03-08 19:04:26 EST --- This package requires stax-ex, which does not appear to be posted for review anywhere. It is in marek's queue here: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/jboss_as/queue/2012-01-21/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 Bug 796201 depends on bug 801695, which changed state. Bug 801695 Summary: Review Request: stax-ex - StAX API extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801695 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 --- Comment #6 from Andy Grimm <agrimm(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-03-09 19:53:40 EST --- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [!] Rpmlint output: glassfish-jaxb.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/glassfish-jaxb/jaxb-xjc.jar glassfish-jaxb.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/glassfish-jaxb/jaxb-impl.jar glassfish-jaxb.src: W: invalid-url Source0: glassfish-jaxb-2.2.4u1.tar.gz glassfish-jaxb-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs -> Java docs, Java-docs, Avocados 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. The class-path-in-manifest errors should be fixed. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#class-path-in-manifest [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1]. [x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2]. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. [x] Buildroot definition is not present [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4]. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: CDDL and GPLv2 with exceptions [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [-] All independent sub-packages have license of their own [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5]. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with good reason [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore) [x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixing) [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks) [x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils [x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils [-] Package uses %global not %define [x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...) [x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building [x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details) [x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant [x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap === Maven === [x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms [-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a comment [-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven.local.depmap.file=*" explain why it's needed in a comment [x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro === Other suggestions === [x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac) [x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary [x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible) [!] Latest version is packaged. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: rawhide x86_64 === Issues === 1. Please fix the class-path-in-manifest rpmlint messages 2. Version 2.2.5 was released in February. Please update the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 Andy Grimm <agrimm(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Andy Grimm <agrimm(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-03-11 11:14:41 EDT --- Confirmed that the rpmlint issue is fixed. Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-03-12 08:12:41 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2012-03-23 11:08:26 EDT --- glassfish-jaxb-2.2.5-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glassfish-jaxb-2.2.5-2.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.