https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275318
--- Comment #1 from Renich Bon Ciric <renich(a)woralelandia.com> ---
Here're a few coments:
This package blocks 2275317 as well since it is a dependency of it.
It seems that table.txt is not documentation but a file needed to rebuild
table.go. It should not be marked as documentation IMHO, what do you think?
## Add new characters
1. Edit `table.txt` file.
2. Rebuild `table.go` file:
```go
go run ./make_table.go
```
The license of the package seems to be the Apache License. IIUC, the appache
indicates that a header be applied to every file as a comment:
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "{}"
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
identification within third-party archives.
Copyright {yyyy} {name of copyright owner}
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
... but none of the files do so. I don't know if this is OK but one should try
and contact upstream and let them know about this, if you ask me. What do you
think?
A hidden file has been included:
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gosimple/unidecode/.goipath
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275318
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...