Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 David Sommerseth <davids(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #2 from David Sommerseth <davids(a)redhat.com&gt; 2009-08-10 08:08:44 EDT --- Quick update. I rearranged things according to suggestions. I could not change the ./configure to use %configure, as it is not a autotools based configure script, just a normal shell script doing some basic stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #4 from David Sommerseth <davids(a)redhat.com&gt; 2009-08-10 13:42:33 EDT --- Found one issue regarding debuginfo packages, missing CFLAGS=-g during compilation. I've contacted the upstream developer to see if we can get a patch into the configure scripts which adds the needed compiler flags via CFLAGS. Awaiting feedback before I continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; 2009-09-09 20:38:14 EDT --- I see you removed the NEEDSPONSOR blocker, but I can't find your name in the account system. It's not "davids" and a search on "Sommerseth" finds nothing. What's your FAS ID? I downloaded and unpacked the src.rpm linked above, but it doesn't seem to match the spec file linked above. Whenever you make a change to a package under review, you should increase Release:, generate a new package and update both that and the spec file. Otherwise it quickly becomes difficult for any prospective review to keep things straight. There are far more submissions than reviewers, so making it difficult for reviewers is not a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; 2009-09-23 13:37:09 EDT --- Oh, for whatever reason you have privacy set so that a search for your name finds nothing. I see the "dsommers" account is not in the packager group and I don't see any offer to sponsor you in this ticket, so I've readded the NEEDSPONSOR blocker. One thing I note immediately is that this package does not use the proper set of compiler flags. I see you forced "-g"; you really need to pass all of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Don't worry about the "configure-without-libdir-spec" complaint; rpmlint just doesn't understand that your configure script isn't generated by autoconf. There is no need to try and work around bogus warnings at all, and doing so often only adds needless crap to the spec. The point is to address the rpmlint complaints in the review, even if it's just to note that the complaints are erroneous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; 2009-10-12 15:30:25 EDT --- Some notes: * Using %versin macro - Using %{version} macro on Source0 is preferred because with this you probably won't have to change Source0 line when version is upgraded: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * CFLAGS - CFLAGS is still wrong (i.e. Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 47 + make -j4 48 cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -O -DMAKEFILE_SHAREDIR='"/usr/share/imapfilter"' -I/usr/local/include -c -o auth.o auth.c 49 cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -O -DMAKEFILE_SHAREDIR='"/usr/share/imapfilter"' -I/usr/local/include -c -o buffer.o buffer.c ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Fedora's default optimization level is "-O2" (as you can check by $ rpm --eval %optflags), which is replaced by the latter "-O". * Installing documents ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mkdir -m 755 -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ cp README LICENSE ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - These two lines do nothing and should be removed. ! build.log shows this: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 120 + mkdir -m 755 -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11/ 121 + cp README LICENSE /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11/ ..... ..... 133 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JZOnjc 134 + umask 022 135 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD 136 + cd imapfilter-2.0.11 137 + DOCDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11 138 + export DOCDIR 139 + rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11 140 + /bin/mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11 141 + cp -pr README LICENSE /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11 142 + exit 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Especially see the lines 139-140. i.e. %doc foo (where foo is not a absolute path) means: - First clean up %buildroot%_defaultdocdir/<rpm_name>-%version completely - Then create %buildroot%_defaultdocdir/<rpm_name>-%version and copy the specified files into the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; 2009-10-14 15:11:39 EDT --- Please post the correct URL of the srpm :) Anyway: - Now this package can be approved. - Usually a person who needs sponsorship for packager group is requested to either submit another review request or do a pre-review of other person's review request as written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Now you have another review request (bug 515230), which seems good to some extent from a quick glance. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (imapfilter) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11/12, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 David Sommerseth <davids(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(davids(a)redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #14 from David Sommerseth <davids(a)redhat.com&gt; 2009-10-23 10:39:11 EDT --- Sorry! I've been quite busy lately and haven't had time to look into this yet. I've done a koji scratch build which looked good at first sight. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1747177 Unfortunately, I will be very busy the next two weeks or so, before I'll manage to continue. It's far from forgotten ... I just to complete some more urgent work first. I'll come back stronger as soon as possible! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #16 from David Sommerseth <davids(a)redhat.com&gt; 2009-11-16 04:44:17 EDT --- I'm ready for some work on this package now, after some über hectic weeks. Going to read through a lot of the documentation about sponsorship again, to refresh what I need to do now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #18 from David Sommerseth <davids(a)redhat.com&gt; 2009-11-16 08:36:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: imapfilter Short Description: A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers Owners: dsommers Branches: F11 F21 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; 2009-11-16 10:10:21 EDT --- F21 is perhaps F12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2009-11-16 14:02:21 EDT --- imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp&gt; 2009-11-17 11:53:19 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.0.11-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.11-3.fc11 |2.0.11-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Andrea Veri <andrea.veri(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2012-02-24 08:20:32 EST --- imapfilter-2.2.2-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imapfilter-2.2.2-4.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.11-3.fc12 |imapfilter-2.5-1.el6 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2012-03-15 15:56:07 EDT --- imapfilter-2.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.