Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange(a)redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467403 Alias| |mingw32-libgcrypt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; 2008-12-10 11:38:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/... SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libgcrypt-1.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 467410 depends on bug 467403, which changed state. Bug 467403 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-02-03 19:40:56 EDT --- Notes: - Fedora version has been updated to 1.4.4, with substantial patches. Should the mingw32 package be rebased first? - Package description is a bit sparse. Should it be copied from Fedora's? MUST ? rpmlint: source clean, binary has no-doc and script-without-shebang This is not in the guideline -- do all *.def need to have +x permissions? + package name + spec file name + package guideline-compliant + license complies with guidelines + license field accurate - license file not deleted + spec in US English + spec legible + source matches upstream + builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded + build dependencies complete N/A locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale ? library -> ldconfig N/A relocatable: give reason + own all directories + no dupes in %files ? permission -- see question above + %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT + macros used consistently + Package contains code N/A large docs => -doc N/A doc not runtime dependent N/A static in -static N/A if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig N/A desktop file uses desktop-file-install + clean buildroot before install + filenames UTF-8 SHOULD + package functioned as described + scriplets are sane + if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package + require package not files Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; 2009-02-06 09:01:31 EDT --- Thanks for approving this. I have done an updated package which should fix everything you mentioned. I will proceed with the CVS request anyway. * Fri Feb 6 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; - 1.4.4-1 - Update to Fedora native version 1.4.4: . Remove potentially patented ECC support. . Do not abort when the fips mode kernel flag is inaccessible due to permissions (#470219). - For review (Michel Alexandre Salim): . Remove *.def file. . Make description clearer. . Distribute the license files. - The license for binaries is GPLv2+, so update the license field. - Add check section (disabled by default). - Why did we set PATH before configure? Removed. - Added BR mingw32-dlfcn suggested by auto-buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com&gt; 2009-02-08 16:50:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.