https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062999

Davide Cavalca dcavalca@fb.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Blocks| |2063000

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063000 [Bug 2063000] Review Request: python-mnamer - Media file renamer and organizion tool

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062999

Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |jkadlcik@redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062999

--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name --- Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/python-teletype/python-teletype.spe... SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/python-teletype/python-teletype-1.3...

Changelog: - update to 1.3.4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062999

Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Thank you,

Package Review ==============

Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT License", "*No copyright* MIT License", "Unknown or generated". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python- teletype/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [?]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages.

Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-teletype-1.3.4-1.fc38.noarch.rpm python-teletype-1.3.4-1.fc38.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpnnq8cjab')] checks: 31, packages: 2

2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s

Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 1

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s

Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/t/teletype/teletype-1.3.4.tar... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b81a69338c3d1a532062a2851b0d51723beafa69d4d382b713be230a02bd618a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b81a69338c3d1a532062a2851b0d51723beafa69d4d382b713be230a02bd618a

Requires -------- python3-teletype (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi)

Provides -------- python3-teletype: python-teletype python3-teletype python3.11-teletype python3.11dist(teletype) python3dist(teletype)

Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name python-teletype --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python Disabled plugins: PHP, SugarActivity, R, fonts, Ocaml, Haskell, C/C++, Perl, Java Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062999

Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062999

Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-74ce0854d9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-74ce0854d9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062999

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-7c3470ef7e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7c3470ef7e

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062999

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-7c3470ef7e has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-7c3470ef7e *` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7c3470ef7e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062999

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-7c3470ef7e has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.