Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609012
--- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> 2010-11-04 12:43:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
* description and spec file clean, no useless comments
- URL contains a dead link.
Fixed
- Project name and package name consistency GoodData-CL Vs.
gooddata-cl
- Build failed for f13 [1]
F13 is too old.
and also f14 [2].
Fixed.
gooddata-cl.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
* if this package is intended to be build for EPEL, it should contain
buildroot tag.
EPEL is even more ancient.
gooddata-cl.src: W: strange-permission gooddata-cli 0755L
* file listed in %{_bindir}, rpmlint shouldn't be complaining
Well this is about the Source file. Fixed.
- missing BuildDeps reported by koji:
DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for axis >= 1.4
DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for javacc-maven-plugin
DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for xpp3-minimal >= 1.1.3.8-3.4
DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for xstream >= 1.3.1
DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for json-lib
DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for gdata-java > 1.39
This is on F13. That's too old.
SPEC:
http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/gooddata-cl.spec
SRPM:
http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/gooddata-cl-1.1.4-2.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.