Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 ------- Additional Comments From dev(a)nigelj.com 2007-06-28 16:37 EST ------- SRPM: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/dynamips-0.2.7-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/dynamips.spec I've just noticed 0.2.7 vs 1.2.7, I'll fix that tonight (opps). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4(a)yahoo.fr 2007-07-31 17:37 EST ------- Hi review. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/dynamips-0.2.7-1.fc6.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/dynamips-0.2.7-1.fc6.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/dynamips-debuginfo-0.2.7-1.fc6.i386.rpm => clean Ok %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. Ok License Text => absent whereas the COPYING is present in the original tarball (I think README can also be included) meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok Ok in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc No (see above) Ok to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Ok provided in the spec URL. Ok least one supported architecture. Built Ok on i386 Ok There is no so Ok symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. Ok this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Ok I would prefer a more detailled one [ie {%_mandir}/man1/ is not owned by the software as it contains other files (that would lead to a confusion on rpm -qf I think)] %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_bindir}/nvram_export %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/nvram_export.1.gz %{_mandir}/man7/hypervisor_mode.7.gz Ok executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Ok %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Ok section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok Ok of the application. Ok Ok Ok directory ownership and usability) Ok then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Ok package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Ok removed in the spec. Ok and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. Ok This is why I would prefer a more detailed %files section (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Ok Ok I did not find any big issue with the SHOULD condition. Regards, P.Y. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4(a)yahoo.fr 2007-07-31 18:15 EST ------- I realize looking at the official website that I will not be able to test the package. I am sorry but I can not do the review for the two packages. Sorry again Regards, P.Y. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2007-09-22 00:03 EST ------- I have to wonder about this; it's not useful without Cisco firmware, which we can't give out. We can't even tell anyone where to get it, since it is only available to Cisco customers. So I'm not sure whether this package is acceptable for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 redhat-bugzilla(a)camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat- | |bugzilla(a)camperquake.de ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla(a)camperquake.de 2007-11-28 06:44 EST ------- Apart from the IOS files, the sources contain two binary files (mips64_microcode, ppc32_microcode) which are somehow incorporated into the emulator. I do not know what these files contain or where they come from and what license they are under. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 dev(a)nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From dev(a)nigelj.com 2008-06-03 02:38 EST ------- About time I closed this, doesn't meet entry requirements (binary blobs, ios etc etc) - closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.