Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; 2009-06-04 00:01:34 EDT --- Indeed, builds fine and rpmlint finds nothing to whine about. I note there are what seem to three test files in the tarball. Could they be run at package build time? It doesn't really look like it (at least one is interactive) but I figured I'd ask. I can't find anything wrong, so I'll just assume that the test stuff isn't useful for a build-time test and approve this. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: ef2e30318170b914527285dcb4c0ecfa138a0cdcef462ca874bb986b3840ce76 ancient-0.9.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm dllancient.so()(64bit) ocaml(Ancient) = a808df18618232a19217dd1014d99175 ocaml-ancient = 0.9.0-1.fc11 ocaml-ancient(x86-64) = 0.9.0-1.fc11 = ocaml(Pervasives) = 88cb1505c8bdf9a4dcd2cdf3452732b4 ocaml(Unix) = 0596a58544f8cd88fed5bf5432a53d43 ocaml(runtime) = 3.11.0 ocaml-ancient-devel-0.9.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ocaml-ancient-devel = 0.9.0-1.fc11 ocaml-ancient-devel(x86-64) = 0.9.0-1.fc11 = ocaml-ancient = 0.9.0-1.fc11 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * .cma, .cmi, .so, .so.owner, META files in the main package. * .a, .cmxa, .cmx and .mli files are in the -devel subpackage. * .cmo, .o and .ml files not included * .so files have no rpath APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; 2009-06-04 11:36:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2009-06-04 13:54:19 EDT --- ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2009-06-15 22:07:36 EDT --- ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ocaml-ancient'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.0-1.fc11 |0.9.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.