Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577152
Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #16 from Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-20 07:46:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
> Group for apoextractor should be Group: System Environment/Libraries,
> Development/Libraries is for -devel only.
I'll change that, thanks.
By the way, do you know of any Fedora guidelines for choosing RPM groups? I
guess there are none, since RPM groups are pretty much obsoleted by comps.
NO
guideline as I known, but comps can not replace rpm group because most
libraries are not registerd in comps.
> I noticed apiextractor rpm for opensuse patched the place of
cmake modules from
> %{_libdir}/cmake/ApiExtractor-%{version}/ to %{_libdir}/cmake/ApiExtractor, I'
> not sure if it's needed.
No idea why they would want to do that. CMake searches both directories for
module configuration files, so there is really no advantage using one over
other.
Do you have a link to that opensuse package?
No difference between the two places for cmake modules I think, but we still
need a convention to treat cmake modules.
See
http://www.pyside.org/downloads/
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/cgoncalves:/pyside:/
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.