https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620568
Iñaki Ucar <i.ucar86(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |i.ucar86(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Iñaki Ucar <i.ucar86(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to clime from comment #5)
In my opinion as an observer, the main think is to name the package
differently, then there is going to be no conflict.
There is a thread in fedora-devel where they were talking about this kernel,
and about the possibility of porting some of the patches to Fedora:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
The conclusion was that many of these patches are Intel-specific, so it
wouldn't be a good idea to port them to Fedora, because it would harm its aim.
Someone proposed that the way to go was to maintain this in a Copr, and Manas
volunteered.
Anyway, I don't know of any other kernel version accepted in the main repos
with other name, and the packaging guidelines and policies talk about *the*
kernel, as if there was just one. So at the very least, I think that someone
from the kernel team should take a look at this ticket.
By the way, you can get
the links to srpm and spec from the build in Copr
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pac23/
High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/
00777716-kernel/
Robert-André knows how to get the SPEC and the SRPM from a Copr repo, but
that's not the procedure. There is even a template when you open a review
request to link them, so that the reviewer can use the fedora-review tool just
with the bug ID.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component