https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019157
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |POST
CC| |zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl
Flags| |fedora-review+
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> ---
License: BSD and (BSD and ISC)
You can simplify this to just "BSD". ISC is explicitly the same as BSD but with
a few terms removed.
So to satisfy both BSD and ISC you need to satisfy exactly BSD. And the License
field is the effective
license
[
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#What_is_.22effective_license...].
BuildRequires: %{py3_dist pytest}
Nowadays we mostly write
'python3dist(pytest)'…
+ package name is OK
+ latest version
+ license is acceptable (effectively BSD-3-clause)
- license is specified correctly: see above
+ builds and installs OK
+ %check is present and passes
+ BR/R/P look OK
rpmlint:
python3-pyct.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cmd -> cm, cad,
cod
python3-pyct.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subcommands -> sub
commands, sub-commands, commands
Bogus.
python3-pyct.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyct/.version
Upstream "design choice"
python3-pyct+build.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta
package, Meta-package, Prepackage
python3-pyct+build.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pyct -> pct, pact
python3-pyct+build.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metapackage
-> meta package, meta-package, prepackage
python3-pyct+build.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pyct -> pct,
pact
python3-pyct+cmd.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta
package, Meta-package, Prepackage
python3-pyct+cmd.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pyct -> pct, pact
python3-pyct+cmd.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cmd -> cm, cad, cod
python3-pyct+cmd.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metapackage ->
meta package, meta-package, prepackage
python3-pyct+cmd.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cmd -> cm,
cad, cod
python3-pyct+cmd.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pyct -> pct,
pact
python-pyct.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cmd -> cm, cad, cod
python-pyct.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subcommands -> sub
commands, sub-commands, commands
I wish rpmlint would be smart enough to filter out the package name from
spelling reports, alas.
python3-pyct+build.noarch: W: no-documentation
python3-pyct+cmd.noarch: W: no-documentation
python-pyct.src:55: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
bundled(python3dist(clint))
python-pyct.src:130: W: macro-in-%changelog %autochangelog
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 19 warnings.
All bogus too.
Package is APPROVED. Please fix the License field when importing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019157