[Bug 729199] New: Review Request: satsolver - A new approach to package dependency solving
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: satsolver - A new approach to package dependency solving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
Summary: Review Request: satsolver - A new approach to package dependency solving Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tchollingsworth@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Spec URL: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/satsolver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/satsolver-0.17.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: A new approach to package dependency solving
(previous review in bug442714 failed due to now fixed RPM incompatibilities)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |729203
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |729201
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |729200
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #1 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com 2011-08-09 08:35:36 EDT --- $ rpmlint SPECS/satsolver.spec SPECS/satsolver.spec:101: W: macro-in-%changelog %3AFactory SPECS/satsolver.spec:101: W: macro-in-comment %3AFactory SPECS/satsolver.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: satsolver-0.17.2.tar.bz2 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
$ rpmlint SRPMS/satsolver-0.17.2-1.fc15.src.rpm satsolver.src:101: W: macro-in-%changelog %3AFactory satsolver.src:101: W: macro-in-comment %3AFactory satsolver.src: W: invalid-url Source0: satsolver-0.17.2.tar.bz2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #2 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com 2011-08-09 08:45:56 EDT --- Sorry, should have done the binary RPM, not the SRPM.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/libzypp-9.10.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm libzypp.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libzypp-config libzypp.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/libzypp.lr libzypp.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary package-manager-su libzypp.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary package-manager libzypp.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zypp-CheckAccessDeleted 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/libzypp-devel-9.10.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/ProblemSolutionCombi.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/Helper.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/ProblemTypes.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/Types.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/SolverQueueItem.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/SolverQueueItemInstall.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/Resolver.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/ProblemSolutionIgnore.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/SolverQueueItemDelete.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/InstallOrder.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/SATResolver.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/SolverQueueItemUpdate.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/SolverQueueItemInstallOneOf.h libzypp-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/zypp/solver/detail/SolverQueueItemLock.h 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 0 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com 2011-08-09 08:52:54 EDT --- Oops, wrong tab. Sorry for the noise, folks.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/satsolver-0.17.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repo2solv.sh satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repomdxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mergesolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dumpsolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary installcheck satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deltainfoxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmdb2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary updateinfoxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmmd2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpms2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary susetags2solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/satsolver-devel-0.17.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary helix2solv satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deptestomatic 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/satsolver-demo-0.17.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2011-08-09 11:43:43 EDT --- I recommend you to write the man page. And add it to this package as patch or sent it to upstream. If you have problem writing man page or you never done it, I recommend you: http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/ http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/asciidoc.1.txt You can write man page using wiki syntax very quickly.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2011-08-09 11:57:15 EDT ---
rpmlint satsolver-0.17.2-1.fc15.src.rpm satsolver.src:101: W: macro-in-%changelog %3AFactory satsolver.src:101: W: macro-in-comment %3AFactory
You must double that percent char, even in that commend
satsolver.src: W: invalid-url Source0: satsolver-0.17.2.tar.bz2
You have in spec: # download from https://github.com/openSUSE/sat-solver Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 This in not enough. That url offer you just download of HEAD of master branch. And it may change every day or even every hour. You need something reproducible. If upstream does not provide tar.gz you should use something like: # downloaded from https://github.com/openSUSE/sat-solver/commit/b9ef5a9a67d20d330c7b9f88c8a684... # which is tar.gz of commit b9ef5a9a67d20d330c7b9f88c8a684d84a4166e2 in master branch Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2011-08-09 12:04:59 EDT --- You should really do better job with description. Additionally all descriptions must end with dot.
make %{?jobs:-j %jobs}
You should use _smp_mflags macro: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2011-08-09 12:40:25 EDT --- Scratch build in koji (you can do it yourself too even if you are not packager yet): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3262301 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3262302&name=build.log
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:91 (MESSAGE): Please install 'check' and 'check-devel' packages (missing: CHECK_LIBRARY CHECK_INCLUDE_DIR)
You are missing some Buildrequires.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #8 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com 2011-08-09 21:16:57 EDT --- Thanks for taking a look at this. Everything is now fixed except for the man pages.
Spec: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/satsolver.spec SRPM: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/satsolver-0.17.2-2.fc15.src.rpm
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3263280
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/satsolver-0.17.2-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repo2solv.sh satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repomdxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mergesolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dumpsolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary installcheck satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deltainfoxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmdb2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary updateinfoxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmmd2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpms2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary susetags2solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/satsolver-devel-0.17.2-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libzypp -> Libby satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libzypp -> Libby satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US satisfiability -> insatiability, advisability satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary helix2solv satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deptestomatic 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/satsolver-demo-0.17.2-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: satsolver - |Review Request: satsolver - |A new approach to package |Dependency solving library |dependency solving |for libzypp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #9 from Terje Røsten terjeros@phys.ntnu.no 2011-08-12 07:02:00 EDT --- Created attachment 518012 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=518012 spec file parch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
Terje Røsten terjeros@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros@phys.ntnu.no
--- Comment #10 from Terje Røsten terjeros@phys.ntnu.no 2011-08-12 07:02:52 EDT --- Patch to fix some minor issues:
- sort buildreq and remove implicit buildreq - use %cmake to build: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake - add %check, ctest seems to fail, please have a look - fix %defattr - fix req in -devel subpkg - explicit file listing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #11 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com 2011-08-14 08:16:17 EDT --- Thanks for taking a look at this. I've researched the matter further and discovered that we should track the openSUSE stable branches of all the ZYpp tools instead of the latest releases. This way they'll pass the tests and generally be less buggy.
I've also now included the language bindings for this package. I was originally under the impression that they should be packaged seperately, but they're included with the upstream tarball and other Fedora packages also ship them in one SRPM when that is the case.
Spec: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/satsolver.spec SRPM: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.src.rpm
$ rpmlint SPECS/satsolver.spec SPECS/satsolver.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: satsolver-0.16.3.tar.bz2 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libzypp -> Libby satsolver.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libzypp -> Libby satsolver.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US satisfiability -> insatiability, advisability satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repo2solv.sh satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repomdxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mergesolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dumpsolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmdb2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deltainfoxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary susetags2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmmd2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpms2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary updateinfoxml2solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings.
$ rpmlint satsolver-devel-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libzypp -> Libby satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libzypp -> Libby satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US satisfiability -> insatiability, advisability satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary helix2solv satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deptestomatic 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
$ rpmlint python-satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm # not filtered because this package contains binaries in $PATH python-satsolver.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_satsolver.so _satsolver.so()(64bit) python-satsolver.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint ruby-satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint perl-satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm # not filtered because this package contains binaries in $PATH perl-satsolver.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/satsolver.so satsolver.so()(64bit) perl-satsolver.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/satsolver.so satsolver.so()(64bit) perl-satsolver.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
$ rpmlint satsolver-demo-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #12 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2011-08-16 04:39:16 EDT --- Fedora15, rpmbuild -ba satsolver.spec: ... .6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit) libexpat.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.3.3)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Processing files: ruby-satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64 error: File not found: /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/satsolver error: File not found: /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/satsolver.rb error: File not found by glob: /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/satsolver/*.rb error: File not found: /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/satsolver.so Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5sXmbs + umask 022 + cd /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd satsolver-0.16.3 + DOCDIR=/home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/share/doc/ruby-satsolver-0.16.3 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/share/doc/ruby-satsolver-0.16.3 + /bin/mkdir -p /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/share/doc/ruby-satsolver-0.16.3 + cp -pr bindings/ruby/html /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/share/doc/ruby-satsolver-0.16.3 cp: cannot stat `bindings/ruby/html': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5sXmbs (%doc)
RPM build errors: File not found: /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/satsolver File not found: /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/satsolver.rb File not found by glob: /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/satsolver/*.rb File not found: /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64/usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/satsolver.so Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5sXmbs (%doc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #13 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2011-08-16 04:40:07 EDT --- And: + ctest Test project /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/BUILD/satsolver-0.16.3 Start 1: solv_test 1/5 Test #1: solv_test ........................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 2: solver_testsuite 2/5 Test #2: solver_testsuite ................. Passed 3.13 sec Start 3: tools_content_os11beta3 3/5 Test #3: tools_content_os11beta3 ..........***Failed 0.14 sec Start 4: tools_content_os11_1 4/5 Test #4: tools_content_os11_1 .............***Failed 0.04 sec Start 5: tools_rpmmd_pattern 5/5 Test #5: tools_rpmmd_pattern ..............***Failed 0.04 sec
40% tests passed, 3 tests failed out of 5
Total Test time (real) = 6.38 sec
The following tests FAILED: 3 - tools_content_os11beta3 (Failed) 4 - tools_content_os11_1 (Failed) 5 - tools_rpmmd_pattern (Failed) Errors while running CTest
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
--- Comment #14 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com 2011-08-16 06:58:53 EDT --- Well, part of the problem is that I forgot BuildRequires on swig, but even when I add that build fails on koji, because it can't find the Python or Ruby interpreters. I have BuildRequires on python2-devel and ruby, and YUM successfully installs them in koji, yet attempting to run either interpreter results in an error:
sh: ruby: command not found sh: ruby: command not found sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
Even stranger still, CMake can find Python but not Ruby:
/usr/bin/ruby: no such file to load -- vendor-specific (LoadError) -- Found PythonLibs: /usr/lib64/libpython2.7.so -- Found Perl: /usr/bin/perl -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python2.7 -- Python executable: /usr/bin/python2.7 -- Python lib dir: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages -- Python site dir: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages
Looking over the ctest output, the Python module seems to be building but rpmbuild never gets far enough to know for sure.
Koji build log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3275381&name=build.log Koji task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3275381
This builds fine locally: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.build....
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution| |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2011-08-19 06:48:24
--- Comment #15 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com 2011-08-19 06:48:24 EDT --- Closing because this is blocked on bug729200.
I'm deleting the SRPMS to save my horribly close disk quota but I'll leave the specfiles up for future contributors interested in packaging this.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2011-12-16 04:55:20 EST ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 442714 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla