Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717645
--- Comment #3 from Chris Lalancette <clalance(a)redhat.com> 2011-06-30 11:56:24 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Hi Chris,
by coincidence, I did the same package today before I noticed you did that
yesterday :) So you can take a look for comparison [1]. A few things I noticed
in you spec file:
* Wrong license
Oops, fixed.
* site_libdir is useless for gem packages
Yep, removed.
* you do not provide -doc subpackage, although I am not sure if we
should not
disable the documentation for this gem at all
Hm, I'm really fine either way. I guess it does make sense to have the -doc
package, like other rubygems. I've taken that bit from yours and put it into
mine.
* %defattr is no more needed except EPEL-4
* BuildRoot is deprecated, except EPEL-5 and older I guess
* Clean section is not required anymore
Heh, I had no idea. But re-reading the packaging guidelines, I see that this
is indeed the case. I've removed all 3 of these.
* There is better to use %{geminstdir} macro in %files section
Fixed.
(In reply to comment #2)
And you did not specified ruby(abi)
Right, fixed.
I've re-uploaded the SPEC and SRPM to the same place; can you take a look when
you get a chance?
Thanks,
Chris Lalancette
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.