Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: cobbler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311
------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-07-05 13:03 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
Don't bother with defining your own macros for name, version, and
release, rpm
does that.
-- If I remove the version macro, 'version' will be seperately hard coded into 3
parts of the file. Having the version macro at the top of the file is most
convient for editing and is very much D.R.Y. If i need to call it something
other than 'version', this can be done, though I need to understand the
technical reason for this.
If you remove the line:
%define version 0.1.0
And replace:
Version: %{version}
with:
Version: 0.1.0
then rpm will define the %{version} macro for you, which you can use in the rest
of the spec file just as you are now. Defining it manually is simply redundant.
Same goes for the %{name} and %{release} macros; there is no need to define them
manually.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.