https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Bug ID: 856002 QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: plug - Linux software for Fender Mustang amplifiers Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jonathan.underwood@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug-1.1-3.fc17.src.rpm Description: Linux replacement for Fender FUSE software for Mustang amps Fedora Account System Username: jgu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario.blaettermann@gmail.co | |m
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- gcc-c++ is part of the minimum build environment, please drop it from BR: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug-1.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
* Sun Sep 23 2012 Jonathan G. Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com - 1.1-4 - Remove BuildRequires for gcc-c++ - Use pkgconfig style BuildRequires for qt-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4525705
$ rpmlint -i -v * plug.src: I: checking plug.src: W: non-standard-group Hardware/Other The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "Unspecified", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support".
plug.src: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.src:12: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.
plug.src: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/download/v1.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) plug.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://piorekf.org/plug/download/v1.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
plug.i686: I: checking plug.i686: W: non-standard-group Hardware/Other The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "Unspecified", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support".
plug.i686: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
plug.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plug Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
plug.x86_64: I: checking plug.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Hardware/Other The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "Unspecified", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support".
plug.x86_64: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
plug.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plug Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
plug-debuginfo.i686: I: checking plug-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking plug-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.spec:5: W: non-standard-group Hardware/Other The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "Unspecified", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support".
plug.spec:12: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.
plug.spec: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/download/v1.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) plug.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://piorekf.org/plug/download/v1.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings.
The "Group" tag is invalid. Either use one of those mentioned above, or remove it, if you don't want to provide your package for EPEL (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag).
Don't mix spaces and tabs. I recommend spaces because this way the spec file looks the same in any text editor, independent from the configured tab width.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug-1.1-5.fc17.src.rpm
* Sun Sep 30 2012 Jonathan G. Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com - 1.1-5 - Change Group to Applications/System - Untabify spec file - Fix Source URL
(In reply to comment #3)
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4525705
$ rpmlint -i -v * plug.src: I: checking plug.src: W: non-standard-group Hardware/Other The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "Unspecified", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support".
Changed group to Applications/System
plug.src: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.src:12: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.
Fixed.
plug.src: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/download/v1.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) plug.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://piorekf.org/plug/download/v1.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
Fixed.
plug.i686: I: checking plug.i686: W: non-standard-group Hardware/Other The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "Unspecified", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support".
plug.i686: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
This is a false positive - the file under /usr/lib is a udev rule file which absolutely must go in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/
plug.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plug Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
plug.x86_64: I: checking plug.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Hardware/Other The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "Unspecified", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support".
Fixed.
plug.x86_64: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
False positive - see above.
plug.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plug Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
This is a graphical application with no command line switches. A man page really isn't necessary.
plug-debuginfo.i686: I: checking plug-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking plug-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.spec:5: W: non-standard-group Hardware/Other The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "Unspecified", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support".
Fixed.
plug.spec:12: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.
Fixed.
plug.spec: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/download/v1.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) plug.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://piorekf.org/plug/download/v1.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
Fixed.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings.
The "Group" tag is invalid. Either use one of those mentioned above, or remove it, if you don't want to provide your package for EPEL (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag).
As noted above, I changed it to Applications/System so as to make it easy for someone to create an EPEL branch (I probably won't).
Don't mix spaces and tabs. I recommend spaces because this way the spec file looks the same in any text editor, independent from the configured tab width.
Fixed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mario.blaettermann@gmail.co | |m Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- New scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4552310
$ rpmlint -i -v * plug.src: I: checking plug.src: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.src: I: checking-url https://bitbucket.org/piorekf/plug/get/v1.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) plug.i686: I: checking plug.i686: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
plug.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plug Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
plug.x86_64: I: checking plug.x86_64: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
plug.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plug Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
plug-debuginfo.i686: I: checking plug-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking plug-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.spec: I: checking-url https://bitbucket.org/piorekf/plug/get/v1.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
No recognizable issues.
The group "plugdev" will be created at installation. This is OK so far, but the command has to be followed by "exit 0". See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups for more information.
No further objections from my side, your package is ready for a full review once you've fixed the mentioned issue.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Brendan Jones brendan.jones.it@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brendan.jones.it@gmail.com Blocks| |805236 (FedoraAudio)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #6 from Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com --- Thanks very much for picking this one up! Just one note about the udev/plughw group rule, I went through some discussion about this a while back with the devel list and the correct fedora way is with a dynamic access control list, see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-March/004795.html and http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/164837.html
In summary having this installed as plug.50-mustang.rules : SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ENV{DEVTYPE}=="usb_device", \ ATTRS{idVendor}=="1ed8", ATTRS{idProduct}=="000[456]", \ ENV{ID_AMPLIFIER_PANEL}="1" ENV{ID_AMPLIFIER_PANEL}=="1", TAG+="uaccess"
Means you don't need the plugdev group and udev rule to change group for it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com --- Thanks Ian, that's useful info - I had been digging into this actually, but hadn't actually got it figured out - you just saved me a lot of brain ache!
Am a little snowed under at work, but will upload new packages at the weekend with these changes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/plug-1.1-6.fc17.src.rpm
* Tue Oct 16 2012 Jonathan G. Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com - 1.1-6 - Change udev rules to be systemd conformant (See BZ 856002 comment 6) - No longer created the plugdev group - Drop unneeded README.Fedora file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4651203
$ rpmlint -i -v * plug.src: I: checking plug.src: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.src: I: checking-url https://bitbucket.org/piorekf/plug/get/v1.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) plug.i686: I: checking plug.i686: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
plug.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plug Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
plug.x86_64: I: checking plug.x86_64: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
plug.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plug Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
plug-debuginfo.i686: I: checking plug-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking plug-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://piorekf.org/plug/ (timeout 10 seconds) plug.spec: I: checking-url https://bitbucket.org/piorekf/plug/get/v1.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
No recognizable issues.
--------------------------------- key:
[+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work ---------------------------------
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. GPLv3+ [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ sha256sum * 92d7562fc8b803176d01234c73f6594816d8a0f1ff046b6f7ab980e3f4e65723 v1.1.tar.gz 92d7562fc8b803176d01234c73f6594816d8a0f1ff046b6f7ab980e3f4e65723 v1.1.tar.gz.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations) [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [.] MUST: Development files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} [.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [.] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See Koji build above (which uses Mock anyway). [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [.] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [.] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [.] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. If it doesn't, work with upstream to add them where they make sense.
----------------
PACKAGE APPROVED
----------------
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com --- Thanks for taking the time to review, Mario.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underwood@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: plug Short Description: Linux replacement for Fender FUSE software for Mustang amps Owners: jgu Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- No packages built yet...?
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2012-12-14 18:31:42
--- Comment #14 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- Packages for all the requested Git branches are marked as stable now.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org