https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976464
--- Comment #1 from Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
- Package does not install. Looks like the hug library
(
https://github.com/hugapi/hug) needs to be packaged first.
- License field in the SRPM does not match the spec file. Was the spec file
edited after the srpm was created?
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "*No copyright* Expat License",
"Unknown or
generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bcotton/fedora/packages/reviews/1976464-python-
concentration/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: Mock build failed
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_use_rpmlint
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
attached diff).
See: (this test has no URL)
Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 2.11 starting (python version = 3.9.5, NVR =
mock-2.11-1.fc34)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
INFO: Signal handler active
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 2.11
INFO: Mock Version: 2.11
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s):
/home/bcotton/fedora/packages/reviews/1976464-python-concentration/results/python3-concentration-1.1.5-1.fc35.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
--releasever 35 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local
--disableplugin=spacewalk install
/home/bcotton/fedora/packages/reviews/1976464-python-concentration/results/python3-concentration-1.1.5-1.fc35.noarch.rpm
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-concentration-1.1.5-1.fc35.noarch.rpm
python-concentration-1.1.5-1.fc35.src.rpm
python3-concentration.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codecov
-> codeine
python3-concentration.noarch: W: invalid-license None
python3-concentration.noarch: W: invalid-url URL None
python3-concentration.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/concentration/run.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
python3-concentration.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary concentration
python-concentration.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codecov ->
codeine
python-concentration.src: W: invalid-license None
python-concentration.src: W: invalid-url URL None
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
Source checksums
----------------
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/c/concentration/concentrat...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
861ac13fea2b1f2828f9aaf6449b77552ad0ff9bfc2336be8b8508f21b7a3e55
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
861ac13fea2b1f2828f9aaf6449b77552ad0ff9bfc2336be8b8508f21b7a3e55
Requires
--------
python3-concentration (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
(python3.10dist(hug) < 3 with python3.10dist(hug) >= 2.6.1)
(python3dist(hug) >= 2.6.1 with python3dist(hug) < 3)
/usr/bin/python3
python(abi)
python3dist(setuptools)
Provides
--------
python3-concentration:
python-concentration
python3-concentration
python3.10-concentration
python3.10dist(concentration)
python3dist(concentration)
Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
---
/home/bcotton/fedora/packages/reviews/1976464-python-concentration/srpm/python-concentration.spec
2021-06-28 13:45:33.552570252 -0400
+++
/home/bcotton/fedora/packages/reviews/1976464-python-concentration/srpm-unpacked/python-concentration.spec
2021-06-26 06:28:32.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,5 +7,5 @@
Summary: Get work done when you need to, goof off when you don't
-License: MIT
+License: None
URL: None
Source0: %{pypi_source}
@@ -16,5 +16,5 @@
%description
-Python concentration is magic you need and the one you deserve
+Concentration [![PyPI version]( [![Test Status]( [![Lint Status]( [![codecov](
%package -n python3-%{pypi_name}
@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@
Requires: python3dist(setuptools)
%description -n python3-%{pypi_name}
-Python concentration is magic you need and the one you deserve
+Concentration [![PyPI version]( [![Test Status]( [![Lint Status]( [![codecov](
Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1976464
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python
Disabled plugins: R, SugarActivity, Java, Ocaml, C/C++, fonts, Haskell, PHP,
Perl
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component