Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu 2006-07-13 20:06 EST ------- And you should omit static libs (%_libdir/lib*.a) and %{_libdir}/lib*.la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo(a)redhat.com 2006-07-16 00:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) Don't know. It probably is rolled by someone specifically for Red Hat Linux / Fedora. I just got it from freetype-2.1.10 SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo(a)redhat.com 2006-07-16 00:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) Correct. The freetype package in Core is not dropping those. Will fix both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo(a)redhat.com 2006-07-16 10:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) I don't agree. This is about a compatibility library that was last developed (the 1.x series) in 2000. I strongly believe that we should just continue to ship the exact same thing that we have been shipping so far in core, instead of archeology. There's absolute no advantage in switching over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo(a)redhat.com 2006-07-16 12:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) What do you suggest I do, given that changing source is not an option? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo(a)redhat.com 2006-07-17 14:34 EST ------- I refuse to fix something that is not broken. If you just want to verify the tarball, you can compare it to the one in freetype-2.1.10 core package. If the review cannot go through with the current tarball, I withdraw my request and let someone else package freetype1. A few Extras packages depend on it. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo(a)redhat.com 2006-07-20 18:13 EST ------- I fail to find any official upstream releases of FreeType 1.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 rdieter(a)math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rdieter(a)math.unl.edu | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu 2006-08-22 08:43 EST ------- Re: comment #12: That is the case (imo). If you refuse to play by the rules (using verifiable, upstream source), then follow through on your threat and withdraw the Review Request (and close this bug). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 rdieter(a)math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter(a)math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu 2006-08-22 15:15 EST ------- It was what it was, though I apologize for taking the too aggressive tone. I was cranky that I had too many (inactive) bugs not getting fixed this morning, and I took a little of that out on you. Thanks for the Extras (pun intended) effort. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl 2006-10-19 11:23 EST ------- Hi all, First of all apologies for hijacking this review, but it seems a bit stalled. Some timeago davej send a mail to the FE list that he would dearly miss MagicPoint, since davej is a nice guy and does tremendous work for the FC kernel I thought I could do him a favour by unorphaning MagicPoint however it turns out that MagicPoint requires freetype1, so here I am. Behdad Esfahbod, thanks for creating and posting the freetype1 compat package, I think it is great that you thought about possible troubles for FE when dropping this from Core. However I also see that you are not an FE contributer at the moment and thus need to go to the sponsering process. Is this the only package you intend to submit and maintain in FE, or do you plan to submit other packages too? If this is the only one then it would maybe be better if someoneelse (me for example) maintained freetype1 in FE, in that case I would like to ask you to be my co-maintainer as I assume you no freetype infinetely better then I do so if I get any bug reports against freetype which are about functional problems (not packaging problems) then I could really use your help. If you intend to submit more packages then you'll need a sponsor. Since I can sponsor people and I know have a vested interest in getting freetype1 into FE, let me offer myself as your sponsor in this scenario. Either way I've already prepared a cleaned up and improved freetype1 package with the following changes: * Thu Oct 19 2006 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; 1.4-0.2.pre - Base on freetype-1.3.1.tar.gz + a patch with the changes contained in the 1.4pre tarbal found in previous Fedora Core freetype releases - Cleanup and FE-ize the spec file - Don't reautoconf as that doesn't seem nescesarry - Fix (remove) use of rpath - Don't include static libs and .la files - Give the freetype1-utils Obsoletes and Provides an Epoch instead of using a 2.x version. Do you know why the whole reautoconf thing was ever done in the first place? You can get this new version from here: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/freetype1.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/freetype1-1.4-0.2.pre.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo(a)redhat.com 2006-10-19 12:18 EST ------- As for the autoreconf, it's there because the tarball is really really old. If you remove that, make sure you do libtoolize at least. We depend on a recent libtool for libraries to work on all platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu 2006-10-19 14:45 EST ------- I'm swamped temporarily, maybe next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |170936, 185881, 196519 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-12 07:29 EST ------- I can get on with it later today (just got to get the buildsys working again). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-25 18:45 EST ------- Sorry for the delay - had all sorts of problems at this end. rpmlint - clean on all package (non main packages have no docs warnings, ignore) mock - clean REVIEW License - is BSD-like a valid type? Consistent use of macros Spec in UTF-8, US English, Clear No permission / ownership issues Contains documentation (see above) Contains reason for not using smp_make Removes .la files MD5s match for the tarballs Contains clean, pre and postuns No RPM dep issues If you can confirm that BSD-like is a valid license, I'm happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 besfahbo(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tonyyoung(a)lineone.net OtherBugsDependingO| |217479 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo(a)redhat.com 2006-12-01 11:59 EST ------- *** Bug 217479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 bugs.michael(a)gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|163779 | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl 2007-01-11 08:06 EST ------- Thanks, now that I'm sorta back online I've imported and build this, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.