Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461054
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-09-03 20:47:24 EDT ---
This is a simple package; it builds fine and rpmlint is silent.
I can't test it because it exits if /dev/dsp can't be opened and this machine
has no sound card. (It runs up until that point well enough.) However, this
makes me wonder how well use of /dev/dsp works with the modern world of ALSA
and PulseAudio. I have to assume that you have tested this on F8 or F9 and had
no issues with sound output.
The only real problem I see is that the compiler isn't called with the proper
set of flags. This is trivially fixed by calling make thusly:
make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags}
* source files match upstream:
6c9bd2e3d5c1d06c6a84e910deeff3c1e7a7f2c4c0f0376ddfb11fa4855aff9a
qrq-0.1.4.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
X compiler flags are not correct.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
X debuginfo package is incomplete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
qrq = 0.1.4-2.fc10
qrq(x86-64) = 0.1.4-2.fc10
=
/usr/bin/perl
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libncurses.so.5()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libtinfo.so.5()(64bit)
perl(LWP::UserAgent)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I cannot test this software
due to my test machine lacking a sound card.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.