https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #1 from c72578(a)yahoo.de --- - This is my first package and I would need a sponsor. - Link to successful Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18795939 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #2 from c72578(a)yahoo.de --- Motivation for packaging: cpprest (C++REST SDK) is a requirement for Poedit, in order to enable Crowdin integration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #4 from c72578(a)yahoo.de --- Spec URL: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/c72578/8902da86b1987d6ecd7c1e6741082c0... SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/c72578/cpprest/fedora-25-... Dear Michael, thank you very much for your valuable feedback. The spec file has been updated according to your comments. Changes, diff to spec file: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/c72578/cpprest/cpprest.git... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #6 from c72578(a)yahoo.de --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/c72578/rpmbuild/master/SPECS/cpprest.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/c72578/cpprest/fedora-25-... Some Updates to the spec file in the meantime: * Fri Apr 28 2017 Wolfgang Stöggl <c72578(a)yahoo.de&gt; - 2.9.1-3 - Updated spec file - Changed Source0 filename from v2.9.1.tar.gz to cpprest-2.9.1.tar.gz - Convert ThirdPartyNotices.txt to utf-8 Changes, diff to spec file: https://github.com/c72578/rpmbuild/commit/dc36843ccedfa67818662c152fd6479... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #8 from c72578(a)yahoo.de --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/c72578/rpmbuild/master/SPECS/cpprest.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/c72578/cpprest/fedora-25-... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #10 from c72578(a)yahoo.de --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/c72578/rpmbuild/master/SPECS/cpprest.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/c72578/cpprest/fedora-25-... * Fri May 05 2017 Wolfgang Stöggl <c72578(a)yahoo.de&gt; - 2.9.1-6 - Use directory build.release for cmake -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 c72578(a)yahoo.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1449163 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449163 [Bug 1449163] tls.hpp, SSL_R_SHORT_READ undefined in openssl-1.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #13 from c72578(a)yahoo.de --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/c72578/rpmbuild/master/SPECS/cpprest.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/c72578/cpprest/fedora-raw... * Mon May 29 2017 Wolfgang Stöggl <c72578(a)yahoo.de&gt; - 2.9.1-11 - Explicitly require openssl-devel instead of pkgconfig(openssl), so we build against OpenSSL 1.1 on F26 and rawhide and not compat-openssl10. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #15 from c72578(a)yahoo.de --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/c72578/rpmbuild/master/SPECS/cpprest.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/c72578/cpprest/fedora-raw... Update cpprest.spec file - 2.9.1-13 * Wed Jun 07 2017 Wolfgang Stöggl <c72578(a)yahoo.de&gt; - 2.9.1-13 - Add patch to disable tests with long timeouts, which fail in mock build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |projects.rg(a)smart.ms Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #16 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms&gt; --- I see in FAS you're already sponsored as a packager, no need any more to block the tracker. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #18 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Ms-PL", "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "zlib/libpng", "BSD (3 clause)". 714 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/makerpm/1440704-cpprest/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in cpprest- debuginfo [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define major 2, %define minor 9 [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: cpprest-2.9.1-13.fc27.x86_64.rpm cpprest-devel-2.9.1-13.fc27.x86_64.rpm cpprest-debuginfo-2.9.1-13.fc27.x86_64.rpm cpprest-2.9.1-13.fc27.src.rpm cpprest.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id cpprest.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id cpprest-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: cpprest-debuginfo-2.9.1-13.fc27.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory cpprest-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib cpprest.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id cpprest.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Requires -------- cpprest-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cpprest-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cpprest(x86-64) libcpprest.so.2.9()(64bit) cpprest (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit) libboost_system.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_thread.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.1.1()(64bit) libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libssl.so.1.1()(64bit) libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.3)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- cpprest-debuginfo: cpprest-debuginfo cpprest-debuginfo(x86-64) cpprest-devel: cpprest-devel cpprest-devel(x86-64) cpprest: cpprest cpprest(x86-64) libcpprest.so.2.9()(64bit) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/Microsoft/cpprestsdk/archive/v2.9.1.tar.gz#/cpprest-2.... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7097889965df48ec5799d6ed3b4f95f16ca82ee3512eb31db844d9df600bc899 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7097889965df48ec5799d6ed3b4f95f16ca82ee3512eb31db844d9df600bc899 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/bin/fedora-review -b 1440704 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #20 from Gwyn Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/cpprest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- cpprest-2.9.1-13.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b263af9167 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- cpprest-2.9.1-16.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5926e9706 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- cpprest-2.9.1-16.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5926e9706 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2017-07-07 18:59:49 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- cpprest-2.9.1-16.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component