Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Summary: Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno_cornec@hp.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/mindi-busybox.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/mindi-busybox-1.7.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Busybox version suited for Mindi
Reason for having a dedicated version of busybox:
The project has the need for precise functions built-in and some other *NOT* built in (such as modules support).
the project keeps using an older version of busybox as that binary is critical for MondoRescue, and It's not possible to test newer versions all the time. Project needs a very stable busybox for the recovery environment, for which e.g. NFS is no problem ... (contrary to some other versions, ...)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Bruno Cornec bruno.cornec@hp.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |187317
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance@redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c | |om)
--- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-02-17 00:56:44 EDT --- 550 "no such file" for both.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Bruno Cornec bruno.cornec@hp.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno.cornec@hp.com
--- Comment #2 from Bruno Cornec bruno.cornec@hp.com 2009-02-17 08:20:46 EDT --- Sorry for that. The version is now official for upstream and available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/10/mindi-busybox-1.7.3-1.fc10.src.rpm and the SPEC at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/10/mindi-busybox.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
--- Comment #3 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-02-17 20:24:19 EDT --- rpmlint has no complaints
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
--- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-02-17 20:50:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332323) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332323) mock build log on fedora-rawhide-i386
rebuilt successfully
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
--- Comment #5 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-02-17 20:51:11 EDT --- http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packaging/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
--- Comment #6 from Tadej Janež tadej.janez@tadej.hicsalta.si 2009-03-28 11:47:08 EDT --- I don't understand comments #4 and #5. What has mpich2 to do with mindi-busybox?
Just a comment about the name of the package. A saw Anaconda also has its special version of busybox and it is named busybox-anaconda.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|cchance@redhat.com |
--- Comment #7 from Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com 2010-02-24 02:33:44 EST --- please ignore comment #4 and #5, thanks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com 2010-04-28 22:34:28 EDT --- ./SPECS/mindi-busybox.spec:20: W: setup-not-quiet 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
# You might need a '-q' for setup.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |cchance@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c | |om)
--- Comment #9 from Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com 2010-04-28 22:54:37 EDT --- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
# Need a bug filed in bugzilla and put the number next to the ExcludeArch line.
MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
# gcc is in exceptions which is not needed.
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
# Need a line "%find_lang %{name}" in %install section.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Bruno Cornec bruno@mondorescue.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno@mondorescue.org Flag|needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c | |om), | |needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c | |om) |
--- Comment #10 from Bruno Cornec bruno@mondorescue.org 2010-05-03 18:39:17 EDT --- Created Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588550 for lack of power PC support.
gcc dep has been removed
mindi and mindi-busybox is not localized at the moment.
A new intermediate version of the packge is now available at: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/12/mindi-busybox-1.7.3-0.20100504003616.fc12.src.rpm and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/12/mindi-busybox.spec
Let me know if it looks better now
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
--- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us 2010-05-04 12:39:06 EDT --- Caius https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Support the bug is supposed to be filed after the package has been accepted since it doesn't yet have a component in bugzilla to file against. its not a blocker not being in bugzilla. but there should eb a description why in the spec that will be swapped out for the bug info post acceptance.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
--- Comment #12 from Caius Chance me@kaio.net 2010-07-14 19:36:41 EDT --- I had been reviewing this request as a brand new package. I am not sure if this is duplicated to an existing component but in different version or else.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Caius Chance me@kaio.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|me@kaio.net | AssignedTo|me@kaio.net |nobody@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Bruno Cornec bruno@victoria.frmug.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno@victoria.frmug.org
--- Comment #13 from Bruno Cornec bruno@victoria.frmug.org 2011-11-18 19:11:37 EST --- I'd like to get feedback on this request. My latest version is available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/16/x86_64/mindi-busybox.spec and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/16/x86_64/mindi-busybox-1.18.5-0.20111114000556.fc16.src.rpm
TIA for anyone able to help.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org