Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-use-ok - Alternative to Test::More::use_ok
------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2007-04-10 23:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
> BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
> BR: perl(Test::More)
> BR: perl(Test::Harness)
So updated (thanks for the catch). Are we at the point now where we should
expect to list all module dependencies, including code? (e.g., not just
Well, the list above is the result of testing the latest perl
discussed on perl-devel-list@), which has several modules formerly contained in
"perl" split out. I don't know about RH's plans nor whether or when
to see this split perl package in Fedora.
A side-effect of this split-out is building perl-modules having to explictly BR:
those "now/soon to be split-out" modules formerly having been in
actually use when building. In most cases this is "ExtUtils::MakeMaker", but
some cases, it is more - This package is one of those case.
More generally: Blindly adding "BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)" isn't the
solution. One has to track down these modules individually. Fortunately, most
package bomb out with build-failures pretty hard in a buildsystems carrying the
"split perl" package.
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.