Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637
--- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa <cooly(a)gnome.eu.org> 2008-11-21 08:02:53 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
--- Compiling SpanDtmfDecoder.cpp...
/usr/include/spandsp/dtmf.h: In member function 'virtual bool
SpanDtmfDecoder::initialize()':
/usr/include/spandsp/dtmf.h:228: error: too few arguments to function 'void
dtmf_rx_parms(dtmf_rx_state_t*, int, int, int, int)'
SpanDtmfDecoder.cpp:169: error: at this point in file
Patch2 was not applied.
Fixed.
Also, the build system obscures the compiler calls, but I'm not
sure I see any
place that would incorporate the regular Fedora compiler flags. There's no
mention of %{optflags} or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the spec and there's no configure
script to call.
Fixed.
A few notes:
rpmlint
libasync.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libasyncaudio-0.16.1.so
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
libasync.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libasynccpp-0.16.1.so
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
libasync-devel.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libasyncaudio-0.16.1.so exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
libasync-devel.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libasynccpp-0.16.1.so exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
Not entirely sure but I think it safe.
From what I could see there are 2 calls both internal error handling.
I will address this upstream anyway.
libasync.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
libasync-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
I am unable to fix, package does not use libtool and passing -Wl,-as-needed
won't work (fails with undefined reference)
I think the above are harmless.
new version:
http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink.spec
http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink-080730-3.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.