Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lilypond-doc - HTML documentation for lilypond
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192502
tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-05-20 11:34 EST -------
Since this is just a doc package, a quick review should suffice:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* source files match upstream:
45622b94aba72994277d6a0d4fcf706c lilypond-2.8.3-1.documentation.tar.bz2
45622b94aba72994277d6a0d4fcf706c lilypond-2.8.3-1.documentation.tar.bz2-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
Note: code-not-content rule does not apply as this is merely documentation for a
package already in extras, placed in a separate package so that it can be
non-arch-specific.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.