[Bug 1119081] New: Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml - package-review

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

[Bug 1119081] New: Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

older

[Bug 1442506] Review Request: ...

[Bug 1122073] New: Review Request:...

Red Hat Bugzilla

13 Jul 2014 13 Jul '14

2:01 p.m.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Bug ID: 1119081 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rjones@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/camlp4/ocaml-camlp4.spec SRPM URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/camlp4/ocaml-camlp4-4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0... Description:

camlp4 is a pre-processor and pretty printed for OCaml.

Prior to OCaml 4.02 it was part of the compiler, and indeed it has been included in Fedora for aeons. However it has now moved into a separate upstream project (albeit run by exactly the same people) so it seems better to have a separate Fedora package as well.

NOTES:

- There are no tarballs yet, but it is expected there will be upstream releases when OCaml 4.02.0 is out of beta.

- You will only be able to build this against OCaml 4.02 from Rawhide. It is not buildable against earlier versions of OCaml.

Fedora Account System Username: rjones

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Show replies by date

Red Hat Bugzilla

13 Jul 13 Jul

2:04 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- rpmlint output with my comments inline:

ocaml-camlp4.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Pre -> Pr, Re, Pres ocaml-camlp4.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment ocaml-camlp4.src:53: W: configure-without-libdir-spec

This package has a hand-written ./configure which is not compatible with the %configure macro.

ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Pre -> Pr, Re, Pres ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.02.0-0.1 ['4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0.fc20', '4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0'] ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: E: no-binary

Although the ocaml-camlp4 package contains only bytecode, we have found that OCaml bytecode is not portable between architectures, so this package should not be noarch.

ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Pre -> Pr, Re, Pres ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4o.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4orf.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4of.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4of ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4r.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4rf.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4prof ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4oof.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4boot ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4orf ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4oof ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4rf ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4 ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4r ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mkcamlp4 ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4o

Correct, there are no man pages for these binaries upstream. They would be extremely complicated to document.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

2:12 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1119049

--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- Bug 1119049 affects the armv7hl build of this package.

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119049 [Bug 1119049] ocamlopt.opt segfaults when compiling ounit

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

14 Jul 14 Jul

1:04 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Michel Alexandre Salim michel@michel-slm.name changed:

--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel@michel-slm.name --- Taking this bug (what do you want done if this review passes but 1119049 is not resolved yet? Does the workaround you mentioned there work for this too?)

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:38 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:

--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- I hope we can review it anyway. It won't build on ARM, but we can either ExcludeArch arm or (more hopefully) fix the bug in the meantime.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

15 Jul 15 Jul

7:50 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081 Bug 1119081 depends on bug 1119049, which changed state.

Bug 1119049 Summary: ocamlopt.opt segfaults when compiling ounit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119049

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

7:53 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- ARM builds now work. There is a Koji scratch build here:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7143902

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

9:56 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel@michel-slm.name --- Reviewing now; while I'm at it, the license field should probably be changed to just LGPLv2 ?

Here are the commit logs for that file on Github:

https://github.com/ocaml/camlp4/commits/trunk/LICENSE

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:17 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

--- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel@michel-slm.name --- Apart from the license, there are a couple more issues:

- duplicate ocaml(runtime) and ocaml-runtime in Requires: -- the manually added requirement is probably unnecessary? - devel dependency on main package not subversioned with architecture - no %check - upstream's build/install.sh script does not preserve timestamps

Package Review ==============

Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 266 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/michel/sources/fedora/reviews/1119081-ocaml- camlp4/licensecheck.txt

should be just LGPLv2, see https://github.com/ocaml/camlp4/commits/trunk/LICENSE

[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. Do you need to manually require ocaml-runtime = %{version} ? Seems to be redundant: $ rpm -qp --requires results/ocaml-camlp4-4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0.fc22.x86_64.rpm | grep runtime ocaml(runtime) = 4.02.0 ocaml-runtime = 4.02.0

[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ocaml: [x]: This should never happen

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. known not to work, that's fine [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). see note though about the duplicate runtime requires [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ocaml- camlp4-devel [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. the build/install.sh used does not seem to do this [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Rpmlint ------- Checking: ocaml-camlp4-4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0.fc22.x86_64.rpm ocaml-camlp4-devel-4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0.fc22.x86_64.rpm ocaml-camlp4-4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0.fc22.src.rpm ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Pre -> Pr, Re, Pres ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.02.0-0.1 ['4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0.fc22', '4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0'] ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: E: no-binary ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Pre -> Pr, Re, Pres ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4o.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4orf.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4of.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4of ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4r.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4rf.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4prof ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4oof.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4boot ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4orf ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4oof ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4rf ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4 ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4r ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mkcamlp4 ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4o ocaml-camlp4.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Pre -> Pr, Re, Pres ocaml-camlp4.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment ocaml-camlp4.src:53: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 24 warnings.

Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ocaml-camlp4 ocaml-camlp4-devel ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Pre -> Pr, Re, Pres ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.02.0-0.1 ['4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0.fc22', '4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b0'] ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: E: no-binary ocaml-camlp4.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Pre -> Pr, Re, Pres ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4o.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4orf.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4of.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4of ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4r.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4rf.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4prof ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4oof.opt ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4boot ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4orf ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4oof ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4rf ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4 ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4r ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mkcamlp4 ocaml-camlp4-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary camlp4o 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 21 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:'

Requires -------- ocaml-camlp4 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ocaml(Arg) ocaml(Array) ocaml(Buffer) ocaml(Bytes) ocaml(CamlinternalFormatBasics) ocaml(CamlinternalLazy) ocaml(CamlinternalOO) ocaml(Camlp4) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlParser) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlRevisedParser) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlRevisedParserParser) ocaml(Camlp4QuotationCommon) ocaml(Camlp4_config) ocaml(Char) ocaml(Consistbl) ocaml(Digest) ocaml(Dynlink) ocaml(Env) ocaml(Filename) ocaml(Format) ocaml(Hashtbl) ocaml(Ident) ocaml(Int32) ocaml(Int64) ocaml(Lazy) ocaml(Lexing) ocaml(List) ocaml(Location) ocaml(Longident) ocaml(Map) ocaml(Marshal) ocaml(Nativeint) ocaml(Obj) ocaml(Path) ocaml(Pervasives) ocaml(Primitive) ocaml(Printexc) ocaml(Printf) ocaml(Queue) ocaml(Scanf) ocaml(Set) ocaml(Sort) ocaml(Stack) ocaml(Stream) ocaml(String) ocaml(Subst) ocaml(Sys) ocaml(Topdirs) ocaml(Toploop) ocaml(Types) ocaml(Unix) ocaml(Warnings) ocaml(runtime) ocaml-runtime

ocaml-camlp4-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/ocamlrun libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) ocaml-camlp4 rtld(GNU_HASH)

Provides -------- ocaml-camlp4: ocaml(Camlp4) ocaml(Camlp4AstDumper) ocaml(Camlp4AstLifter) ocaml(Camlp4AstLoader) ocaml(Camlp4AutoPrinter) ocaml(Camlp4Bin) ocaml(Camlp4DebugParser) ocaml(Camlp4ExceptionTracer) ocaml(Camlp4FoldGenerator) ocaml(Camlp4GrammarParser) ocaml(Camlp4ListComprehension) ocaml(Camlp4LocationStripper) ocaml(Camlp4MacroParser) ocaml(Camlp4MapGenerator) ocaml(Camlp4MetaGenerator) ocaml(Camlp4NullDumper) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlAstDumper) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlOriginalQuotationExpander) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlParser) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlParserParser) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlPrinter) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlReloadedParser) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlRevisedParser) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlRevisedParserParser) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlRevisedPrinter) ocaml(Camlp4OCamlRevisedQuotationExpander) ocaml(Camlp4Profiler) ocaml(Camlp4QuotationCommon) ocaml(Camlp4QuotationExpander) ocaml(Camlp4Top) ocaml(Camlp4TrashRemover) ocaml(Camlp4_config) ocaml(Camlp4_import) ocaml(Camlp4prof) ocaml(Rprint) ocaml(Top) ocaml-camlp4 ocaml-camlp4(x86-64)

ocaml-camlp4-devel: ocaml-camlp4-devel ocaml-camlp4-devel(x86-64)

Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/ocaml/camlp4/archive/87c6a6b07818acbbef6ced00cc8f4e09b533... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : e3726b9f28d08f4791b67fc24da890d281237231d751d8b201a33fc48a8da844 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e3726b9f28d08f4791b67fc24da890d281237231d751d8b201a33fc48a8da844

Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/bin/fedora-review -b 1119081 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Ocaml, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

16 Jul 16 Jul

3:50 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- (In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #6)

...

Reviewing now; while I'm at it, the license field should probably be changed to just LGPLv2 ?

Here are the commit logs for that file on Github:

https://github.com/ocaml/camlp4/commits/trunk/LICENSE

It's "LGPLv2 with exceptions". Fixed in the upcoming version.

(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #7)

...

duplicate ocaml(runtime) and ocaml-runtime in Requires: -- the manually

added requirement is probably unnecessary?

This is a bit tricky. We need to make sure that it is only installed with the same version of OCaml (camlp4 depends on the abstract syntax tree of a particular version of OCaml).

I added the explicit Requires ocaml-runtime to ensure this.

The dependency generator is adding the ocaml(runtime) dependency, which hopefully duplicates my explicit dependency. If it's wrong, what will happen is the package will be uninstallable -- which is desirable in this case since it would indicate the package was force-built with the wrong version of OCaml and is thus likely to be broken.

...

devel dependency on main package not subversioned with architecture

Multilib is broken with OCaml so you should only install pure 64 bit OCaml packages. Anyway I have added %{?_isa} in the upcoming version.

...

no %check

There are no upstream tests as far as I can see.

...

upstream's build/install.sh script does not preserve timestamps

I will let them know, but I guess they won't care.

Thanks for the review.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

3:56 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

--- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/camlp4/ocaml-camlp4.spec SRPM URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/camlp4/ocaml-camlp4-4.02.0-0.2.git87c6a6b0...

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

17 Jul 17 Jul

9:35 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:

--- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- Hi Michel, did you have a chance to look at the updated spec file? It ought to fix everything that is possible to fix.

Unfortunately this bug blocks many OCaml package rebuilds in Rawhide.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

9:35 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:29 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Michel Alexandre Salim michel@michel-slm.name changed:

--- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel@michel-slm.name --- Hi Richard,

Yep, changes are fine. Was stuck in traffic for much of last night, sorry for the delay.

Package is APPROVED

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

18 Jul 18 Jul

2:40 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

--- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-camlp4 Short Description: Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml Upstream URL: https://github.com/ocaml/camlp4 Owners: rjones Branches: InitialCC:

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

2:41 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

5:44 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

5:44 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

19 Jul 19 Jul

3:15 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

--- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- I can't upload the sources at the moment ...

$ fedpkg -v new-sources camlp4-87c6a6b07818acbbef6ced00cc8f4e09b533e055.tar.gz Uploading: dc6e69fd7a66639fe1d1393c87ada6fa camlp4-87c6a6b07818acbbef6ced00cc8f4e09b533e055.tar.gz INFO:rpkg:Uploading: dc6e69fd7a66639fe1d1393c87ada6fa camlp4-87c6a6b07818acbbef6ced00cc8f4e09b533e055.tar.gz Creating repo object from /home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-camlp4/master DEBUG:rpkg:Creating repo object from /home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-camlp4/master Not in a repo, don't care about remotes DEBUG:rpkg:Not in a repo, don't care about remotes Exception AttributeError: '_read_only' in <bound method write.__del__ of <git.config.write object at 0x1ab6d70>> ignored Could not read /home/rjones/.koji/config for config values DEBUG:rpkg:Could not read /home/rjones/.koji/config for config values Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub DEBUG:rpkg:Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub Could not read /home/rjones/.koji/config for config values DEBUG:rpkg:Could not read /home/rjones/.koji/config for config values Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub DEBUG:rpkg:Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub Could not read /home/rjones/.koji/config for config values DEBUG:rpkg:Could not read /home/rjones/.koji/config for config values Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub DEBUG:rpkg:Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub ^CCould not read /home/rjones/.koji/config for config values DEBUG:rpkg:Could not read /home/rjones/.koji/config for config values Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub DEBUG:rpkg:Initiating a koji session to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub Could not read /home/rjones/.koji/config for config values (last messages repeated ad infinitum)

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

5:34 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:

--- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- All built:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7166497

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

bugzilla＠redhat.com

18 Sep 18 Sep

1:47 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1119081] Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081

Hanns-Joachim Uhl hannsj_uhl@de.ibm.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1451303

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2475

Age (days ago)

3638

Last active (days ago)

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

20 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

bugzilla＠redhat.com
Red Hat Bugzilla